2023
DOI: 10.3390/bs13090761
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychometric Validation of the Adult Prosocialness Behavior Scale in a Professional Teaching Context

Manuel Mieres-Chacaltana,
Sonia Salvo-Garrido,
Sergio Dominguez-Lara
et al.

Abstract: For the teaching profession, prosociality is a relevant skill. From this perspective, the present study aimed to examine the psychometric properties of the Adult Prosocialness Behavior Scale (APBS) in a professional setting of primary school Chilean teachers (n = 1404; mean age = 41.4; SD = 10.8; 77.4% women). ESEM and CFA were applied to evaluate its factor structure, internal consistency, factorial reliability, and invariance. The results supported a bifactor ESEM model in which prosociality was represented … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 110 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To evaluate SO1, the most appropriate factor structure of the PAS was determined by assessing models with theoretical support using a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM). The latter option was chosen because ESEM is primarily a confirmatory technique [ 48 , 49 , 50 ]. However, it is more flexible and has fewer identification and specification errors than the CFA [ 48 , 51 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate SO1, the most appropriate factor structure of the PAS was determined by assessing models with theoretical support using a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM). The latter option was chosen because ESEM is primarily a confirmatory technique [ 48 , 49 , 50 ]. However, it is more flexible and has fewer identification and specification errors than the CFA [ 48 , 51 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%