2003
DOI: 10.1016/s1359-1789(02)00098-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychopathic personality or personalities? Exploring potential variants of psychopathy and their implications for risk assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

34
320
0
11

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 330 publications
(365 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
34
320
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…It is possible that this group of youth become callous through an adaptive response to chronic experiences of prejudice and discrimination. Further, these results are also consistent with conceptualizations of secondary psychopathy, suggesting that there may be some individuals who show high rates of CU traits but who may not show the temperamental deficits in emotional reactivity and for whom CU traits are more related to environmental risk factors (Poythress and Skeem 2005;Skeem et al 2003b). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…It is possible that this group of youth become callous through an adaptive response to chronic experiences of prejudice and discrimination. Further, these results are also consistent with conceptualizations of secondary psychopathy, suggesting that there may be some individuals who show high rates of CU traits but who may not show the temperamental deficits in emotional reactivity and for whom CU traits are more related to environmental risk factors (Poythress and Skeem 2005;Skeem et al 2003b). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…This research aligns with theories of primary and secondary psychopathy (Karpman, 1941;Skeem et al, 2003), which hold that some psychopathic traits may similarly be positively related to shame (Morrison & Gilbert, 2001). Proponents of these theories state that there are two different types of psychopathy (i.e., primary and secondary) that differ based on affective functioning.…”
supporting
confidence: 87%
“…Conversely, both P-impulsivity and Prule-breaking facets, like secondary LSRP, were associated with increased trait impulsivity and sensation seeking, akin to secondary psychopathy. However, while both primary P-facets showed only few significant associations with impulsivity, as predicted by theoretical conceptions of primary psychopathy (Skeem et al, 2003), primary LSRP showed significant associations with all impulsivity associated measures. Both P-interpersonal and P-impulsivity facets were linked to increased verbal aggression; however, their associations with anger and hostility were in opposite directions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Three main models of psychopathy have been offered. First, the two-factor model proposes primary and secondary psychopathy variants with distinct trait correlates, mechanisms, and etiologies (Skeem, Poythress, Edens, Lilienfeld, & Cale, 2003). Primary psychopathy is associated with deficits in affectiveinterpersonal style -including superficial charm, callousness, lack of empathy and guilt.…”
Section: Psychopathy and Its Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%