Psychopathy: Theory, Research and Implications for Society 1998
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-3965-6_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychopathy in Adolescence: Assessment, Violence, and Developmental Precursors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
166
1
6

Year Published

2000
2000
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(186 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
13
166
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, only one published study to date has investigated the validity and reliability of the PCL:YV in a large sample of adolescent females (N ¼ 125; , and no studies have explicitly compared males and females in terms of how psychopathic features manifest themselves and relate to relevant outcomes. Studies using the PCL:YV with all-male samples have generally supported the concurrent and predictive validity of psychopathic features, by showing, for example, that youth with higher scores on the PCL:YV engage in aggressive and delinquent behaviors more often (Forth & Burke, 1998;Kosson et al, 2002), and tend to recidivate violently, more frequently, and in a shorter period of time compared to low-scoring youth (Catchpole & Gretton, 2003;Corrado et al, 2004;Gretton et al, 2004). Notably, in the latter study by Gretton and colleagues (2004), scores on the PCL:YV (coded from archival information) were shown to contribute to the prediction of violent offending over a 10-year retrospective follow-up period once the effects of prior violence, conduct disorder symptoms, and age at first offense were accounted for.…”
Section: Juvenile Psychopathymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In fact, only one published study to date has investigated the validity and reliability of the PCL:YV in a large sample of adolescent females (N ¼ 125; , and no studies have explicitly compared males and females in terms of how psychopathic features manifest themselves and relate to relevant outcomes. Studies using the PCL:YV with all-male samples have generally supported the concurrent and predictive validity of psychopathic features, by showing, for example, that youth with higher scores on the PCL:YV engage in aggressive and delinquent behaviors more often (Forth & Burke, 1998;Kosson et al, 2002), and tend to recidivate violently, more frequently, and in a shorter period of time compared to low-scoring youth (Catchpole & Gretton, 2003;Corrado et al, 2004;Gretton et al, 2004). Notably, in the latter study by Gretton and colleagues (2004), scores on the PCL:YV (coded from archival information) were shown to contribute to the prediction of violent offending over a 10-year retrospective follow-up period once the effects of prior violence, conduct disorder symptoms, and age at first offense were accounted for.…”
Section: Juvenile Psychopathymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Prior North American studies with the PCL:YV have shown that incarcerated adolescent males with high PCL:YV scores display an elevated prevalence of a variety of Ext behaviors, including more aggressiveness [28], more CD symptoms, and greater alcohol and substance abuse compared to low-scoring adolescent males [24]. In contrast to Ext disorders Int disorders are often assumed to vary inversely with psychopathic traits.…”
Section: J Psychopathy and Psychopathologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although researchers have begun to test the predictive utility of the PCL-YV with male adolescents (Forth & Burke, 1998;Ridenour, Marchant, & Dean, 2001) and adult women (Forth, 1996;Rutherford, Cacciola, Alterman, & McKay, 1996: Salekin, Rogers, Ustad, & Sewell, 1998, there are no published studies of recidivism among female adolescents. As previously noted, experts in risk assessment have stated that male-based instruments are likely to function similarly within female populations (Hare, 1991;Webster, 1999).…”
Section: Can Psychopathy Inform the Prediction Of Future Offending Ammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, researchers have cited the benefits of understanding the etiology of the disorder (Forth & Burke, 1998;Lynam, 1996), targeting interventions (Forth & Mailloux, 2000;Frick, Bodin, & Barry, 2000) and increasing case management efficiency (Campbell, Porter, & Santor, 2004;Corrado, Vincent, Hart, & Cohen, 2004) as a justification for extending the PCL-R to adolescents. But we should be careful that our desire to 'nip psychopathy in the bud' does not push our practice further than justified by empirical research.…”
Section: Nipping Psychopathy In the Bud: Clinical And Policy Implicatmentioning
confidence: 99%