Functional analysis methodologies have emerged as powerful tools in research on the assessment and treatment of severe behavior disorders. Although the defining feature of these approaches is the systematic identification of environmental determinants of behavior, research methodology has varied widely with respect to the arrangements used to demonstrate experimental control as well as the types of variables subject to analysis. This commentary summarizes methodological and conceptual issues that have been raised in current research and offers some suggestions for their resolution.DESCRIPTORS: functional analysisThe research and commentaries contained in this issue ofJABA highlight the many uses to which functional analysis methodologies have been put and suggest a number of interesting avenues for future research. Having read all of the manuscripts during the editing process, I was left with the fear that not much remained to be said. However, in our own research and during frequent discussions with students and colleagues, a number of methodological and conceptual questions often arise, several of which either were not addressed in the current papers or were exemplified in ways that may not be immediately apparent (i.e., although the question might be inferred from the data, it was not a central aspect of the study). My commentary, therefore, will focus selectively on some personal concerns about the current status of research on functional analysis methodologies.' Increasing ComplexityOur initial attempts to develop an experimental approach to behavioral assessment met with a num-I am thankful to my students, whose relentless and probing questions often served as the occasion for me to express many of the views presented here, and to Nancy Neef, whose gracious invitation to participate in the organization of this special issue served as an inducement to get my words onto paper.Reprints may be obtained from Brian