2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0891-4222(03)00030-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychopharmacology research for individuals with mental retardation: methodological issues and suggestions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
18
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A range of studies have investigated prescribing patterns of psycholeptic and anticonvulsant drugs in people with ID (Hogg 1992; Matson et al. 2003; Holden & Gitlesen 2004; Valdovinos et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A range of studies have investigated prescribing patterns of psycholeptic and anticonvulsant drugs in people with ID (Hogg 1992; Matson et al. 2003; Holden & Gitlesen 2004; Valdovinos et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2005). These studies raised concern about the quality of prescribing of psychotropic medication in this group (Matson et al. 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There continues to be a predisposition to choose psychopharmacological interventions over behavioural, social or educational interventions, however. It is our opinion that medication‐based interventions can be used in harmony with behavioural interventions and in fact, behavioural research can provide guidance to the determination of treatment efficacy (Matson et al . 2003; Thompson et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…who are ‘blind’) will avoid some of these problems. Finally, during a medication trial all other interventions should be kept the same to control for the confounding effects of multiple interventions (Matson et al . 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last few decades a broad range of medications have been tried . These are very restrictive interventions, they are not targeting specific behaviors and severe and often chronic side effects are common (Advokat, Mayville, & Matson, 2000;Matson, Bielecki, Mayville, & Matson, 2003;Singh, Matson, Cooper, Dixon, & Sturmey, 2005). Having noted these factors, and questionable efficacy in some cases, the use of these drugs for persons with ASD is increasing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%