Human Color Vision 2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-44978-4_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychophysical Correlates of Retinal Processing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 158 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Output evaluation after color development is empirically eye-based; consequently, positive sample recognition is subjective (Pappas, 1994;Waner et al, 1996) and particularly error-prone. Such errors may stem from overlapping dot colorations resulting from host pigment contamination (Chen et al, 2012;Olkkonen and Ekroll, 2016), or from the inherent color discrimination thresholds concerning saturation and hue of the human eye (Krudy and Ladunga, 2001;Reinhard, 2008; Baraas and Zele, 2016;Olkkonen and Ekroll, 2016). Two types of errors are possible in binary classification tests: false positives (FP) or "false alarms" and false negatives (FN) or "missing values," referring to the incorrect recognition of true negatives (TN) as positives and true positives (TP) as negatives, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Output evaluation after color development is empirically eye-based; consequently, positive sample recognition is subjective (Pappas, 1994;Waner et al, 1996) and particularly error-prone. Such errors may stem from overlapping dot colorations resulting from host pigment contamination (Chen et al, 2012;Olkkonen and Ekroll, 2016), or from the inherent color discrimination thresholds concerning saturation and hue of the human eye (Krudy and Ladunga, 2001;Reinhard, 2008; Baraas and Zele, 2016;Olkkonen and Ekroll, 2016). Two types of errors are possible in binary classification tests: false positives (FP) or "false alarms" and false negatives (FN) or "missing values," referring to the incorrect recognition of true negatives (TN) as positives and true positives (TP) as negatives, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This requires extremely careful physical light and individual observer calibrations (Uprety et al 2021). The observer corrections can minimize the individual differences in the inert optical pigments (e.g., lens, macular pigment) and photoreceptor spectral sensitivities between the individual and the CIE standard observer sensitivity functions (Baraas and Zele 2016, Mollon et al 2017, Spitschan et al 2017. In practice, these individual differences can be effectively determined using HFP (Lennie et al 1993, Uprety et al 2021.…”
Section: Methodological Considerations For the Experimental Control O...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By now it is established that, at different light conditions and for different regions of the VF, the following retinal cells selectively sensitive to different wavelengths contribute to human color perception: three types of cones determining daytime color vision and contributing to the twilight vision (short-wave S-cones, with peak sensitivity at ~430 nm; middle-wave M-cones with peak sensitivity at ~530 nm; and long-wave L-cones with peak sensitivity at ~560 nm); rods, the receptors much more sensitive to light than cones (with peak sensitivity between S-and M-cones at ~520 nm) enabling night vision and contributing to twilight vision; and intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs) containing melanopsin with peak sensitivity between rods and L-cones (at about 490 nm). The number of publications on the ipRGSs and their contribution to visual functions is rapidly growing (Berson et al, 2002;Hattar et al, 2002;Dacey et al, 2005;Graham, 2014;Cao & Barrionuevo, 2015;Baraas & Zele, 2016;Hannibal et al, 2017;Zele et al, 2018;Schroeder et al, 2018;Allen et al, 2019;Spitschan, 2019;Yamakawa et al, 2019, etc. ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%