2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2020.103576
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychophysiological modelling and the measurement of fear conditioning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
42
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
2
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One limitation of the current study is that the level of heterogeneity found here may not generalize to other data processing methods, such as model‐fitting techniques such as PsPM where study power is maximized (Bach & Melinscak, 2020). Further, significant work will need to be conducted before standardization of statistical analyses of this paradigm may be achieved; here we have only indicated that systemic issues exist in the current approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…One limitation of the current study is that the level of heterogeneity found here may not generalize to other data processing methods, such as model‐fitting techniques such as PsPM where study power is maximized (Bach & Melinscak, 2020). Further, significant work will need to be conducted before standardization of statistical analyses of this paradigm may be achieved; here we have only indicated that systemic issues exist in the current approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Similarly, the cause for inadequate robustness between trial‐by‐trial and averaged data should be systematically investigated. It is possible that the failure of these methods to replicate is due to lack of power, in which case methods that seek to improve power via experimental design and SCR scoring are highly desirable (Bach & Melinscak, 2020; Melinscak & Bach, 2020). Specifically, improving SCR scoring can provide better estimates of responses relevant to extinction paradigms by reducing measurement error (Bach & Melinscak, 2020), and optimization of experimental designs based on statistical requirements can make analyses more amenable to experimental data (Melinscak & Bach, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a possible reason, retrodictive validity simultaneously depends on trueness and precision of a measure, whereas reliability only depends on precision. For two measures with similar retrodictive validity, the more reliable one will have higher precision and lower trueness, compared the less reliable one (Bach et al, 2020). It is thus possible that scanpath length provides higher trueness but lower precision to measure CS-US association, compared to SCR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In doing so, our primary criterion was retrodictive validity, which jointly assesses the trueness of the measurement (i.e., how close the average over many measurements is to the true score) and its precision (i.e., how much does the measurement vary when true score is constant) (Bach et al, 2020). We also report an approximated split-half reliability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%