2000
DOI: 10.1097/00019442-200002000-00004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychosis of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias: Diagnostic Criteria for a Distinct Syndrome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
238
3
5

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 351 publications
(252 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
6
238
3
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings are also comparable with data on young adults with schizophrenia spectrum disorders (Cattapan‐Ludewig et al ., 2005; Hilti et al ., 2010a) and their nonaffected first degree relatives (Hilti et al ., 2010b), in whom reduced RVP accuracy has been described as a phenotypic marker, reflecting ‘impaired context representation’ (Hilti et al ., 2010b). The fact that such differences were detectable in patients with predominantly mild symptoms, some of whom were not experiencing symptoms at the time of testing, and who would not fulfil criteria for the psychosis syndrome (Jeste and Finkel, 2000) suggests that impaired RVP accuracy may similarly be a trait marker of psychosis proneness in AD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our findings are also comparable with data on young adults with schizophrenia spectrum disorders (Cattapan‐Ludewig et al ., 2005; Hilti et al ., 2010a) and their nonaffected first degree relatives (Hilti et al ., 2010b), in whom reduced RVP accuracy has been described as a phenotypic marker, reflecting ‘impaired context representation’ (Hilti et al ., 2010b). The fact that such differences were detectable in patients with predominantly mild symptoms, some of whom were not experiencing symptoms at the time of testing, and who would not fulfil criteria for the psychosis syndrome (Jeste and Finkel, 2000) suggests that impaired RVP accuracy may similarly be a trait marker of psychosis proneness in AD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the modest efficacy and adverse effect profile associated with antipsychotic use in AD (Schneider et al ., 2006), there is a compelling clinical need to elucidate the pathophysiology of psychotic symptoms and identify novel therapeutic targets (Geda et al ., 2013). There is clear evidence that the psychosis syndrome (delusions and/or hallucinations) (Jeste and Finkel, 2000) represents a distinct endophenotype of AD, with a heritability of around 60% (DeMichele‐Sweet and Sweet, 2010). Attempts to further categorise symptoms using factor analytical approaches have identified two broad subtypes (Cook et al ., 2003): a ‘paranoid’ subtype, which includes delusions of persecution and/or abandonment, and a ‘misidentification’ subtype, characterised by the presence of misidentification phenomena and/or hallucinations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Cornell scale for depression in dementia 9 and the Jeste and Finkel criteria for psychosis of AD and related dementias 10 were applied to AD and VaD groups to exclude depression or psychosis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests a need for designing and conducting further clinical trials of appropriate medications for dementia-associated psychosis and/ or agitation. Although advances in defining phenotypes of psychosis in dementia have been made (eg operationalized criteria for psychosis (Jeste and Finkel, 2000)), these were not used in early clinical trials. Careful consideration must also be given to the validity of outcome measures used for psychosis and other neuropsychiatric symptoms, such as how these may relate to clinically meaningful outcomes.…”
Section: Comparisons With Typical Antipsychoticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Psychosis of AD is characterized by delusions or hallucinations (Jeste and Finkel, 2000). The reported prevalence of delusions in AD patients ranges from 9 to 63% (median 36%), and that for hallucinations from 4 to 41% (median 18%) (Ropacki and Jeste, 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%