2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.05.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychosocial interventions for addiction-affected families in Low and Middle Income Countries: A systematic review

Abstract: The limited evidence does suggest positive benefits to AFMs. The scope of research needs to be extended to other addictions, and family members other than spouse and female relatives. Indigenous and locally adapted interventions are needed to address this issue keeping in mind the limited resources of LMIC. This is a field indeed in its infancy and this under recognised and under-served group needs urgent attention of researchers and policy makers.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
26
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For substance use disorders , two reviews met eligibility for this review, with one review summarizing four studies and another summarizing two studies [ 47 , 49 ]. From one substance use disorder review [ 47 ], all four studies met eligibility criteria, two from Mexico [ 88 , 89 ], one from Vietnam [ 90 ] and one from Malaysia [ 91 ]. The two studies using non-specialists for treatment of substance use disorder in the van Ginneken and colleagues Cochrane review [ 49 ] were excluded because they both took place in a clinical setting.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For substance use disorders , two reviews met eligibility for this review, with one review summarizing four studies and another summarizing two studies [ 47 , 49 ]. From one substance use disorder review [ 47 ], all four studies met eligibility criteria, two from Mexico [ 88 , 89 ], one from Vietnam [ 90 ] and one from Malaysia [ 91 ]. The two studies using non-specialists for treatment of substance use disorder in the van Ginneken and colleagues Cochrane review [ 49 ] were excluded because they both took place in a clinical setting.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For persons with psychosis, only in the community-based rehabilitation evaluation in rural India was an intervention component, village health groups, located in a community location outside of the participants’ home [ 78 ]. All studies included in one of the reviews for substance use disorders [ 47 ] were based in community centers providing deaddiction services. The target population included spouses and adult family members of drug/alcohol users and abusers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies presented the validity of the questionnaire in various populations, such as among family members with relatives showing alcohol, drug or gambling problems (Orford et al, 2005;. Moreover, the CQ has been considered as a widely-used instrument in psychosocial interventions for addiction-affected family members (Rane et al, 2017). It is recommended for use as a longitudinal assessment tool for interventions which primarily focus on the needs of affected family members (Copello et al, 2010a), and for family-based interventions where the substance misusing relative and affected family members jointly participate, such as behavioral couples therapy or the community reinforcement approach ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…42 The Strong Families programme was successfully delivered by lay persons in Afghanistan, as previously successfully described for the delivery of community components of a variety of interventions, 43 such as humanitarian settings or substance abuse treatment programs. 43,44 Particularly in the prevention/promotion of child and adolescent mental health, trained lay persons have been successfully used in the past, 43,45 however it was found uncertain whether they could reduce clinically apparent PTSD symptoms among children. 45 We did not formally assess our study population, and therefore cannot comment on possible clinical diagnoses of our participants at baseline.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%