2019
DOI: 10.1002/pon.5271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychosocial interventions for informal caregivers of lung cancer patients: A systematic review

Abstract: Objective: Caregivers of patients with lung cancer often face physical, emotional, and financial distress, which not only negatively affects the caregivers' mental health and quality of life but may also impact patients' well-being. The purpose of this systematic review is to examine the content, delivery, and efficacy of psychosocial interventions targeting caregivers of lung cancer patients. Methods: Studies included in this systematic review assessed psychosocial interventions for caregivers of lung cancer … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
25
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(165 reference statements)
3
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the linear regression analysis and the QCA, the medical variables of the patient, such as time since diagnosis, number of hospital admissions, comorbidity and functional dependence play an essential role in the emotional distress of the family, as does the emotional distress of the patient [ 22 , 23 ]. The relevance of family caregiver burden is fundamental in preventing their emotional distress, so future studies focused on designing intervention programs in this regard should consider the importance of including elements to reduce the caregiver burden [ 13 , 17 , 19 , 22 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Based on the linear regression analysis and the QCA, the medical variables of the patient, such as time since diagnosis, number of hospital admissions, comorbidity and functional dependence play an essential role in the emotional distress of the family, as does the emotional distress of the patient [ 22 , 23 ]. The relevance of family caregiver burden is fundamental in preventing their emotional distress, so future studies focused on designing intervention programs in this regard should consider the importance of including elements to reduce the caregiver burden [ 13 , 17 , 19 , 22 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the linear regression analysis and the QCA, the medical variables of the patient, such as time since diagnosis, number of hospital admissions, comorbidity and functional dependence play an essential role in the emotional distress of the family, as does the emotional distress of the patient [22,23]. The relevance of family caregiver burden is fundamental in preventing their emotional distress, so future studies focused on designing intervention programs in this regard should consider the importance of including elements to reduce the caregiver burden [13,17,19,22]. Therefore, central elements in emotional distress in palliative COPD patients and their families are the caregiver's burden and the patient's functional independence, taking into account that time since diagnosis, number of admissions, and comorbidity also play a role.…”
Section: Emotional Distress Of Family Caregivers Of End-of-life Patiementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Self-isolation affects not only the lung cancer patient but also their informal caregivers, as social support and psychosocial interventions, although effective ( 47 ), decreased for this group, while the burden of caregiving remained. Furthermore, informal caregivers were increasingly confronted with patients dying at home, as hospices were less available, and professional HCP reduced their visits.…”
Section: Changes Due To Covid-19 Pandemic In Four Pillars Of Palliatimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, caregivers of HCT recipients often experience a tremendous caregiving burden as well as decrements in their quality of life (QOL) and mood 1,2 . Psychosocial interventions aimed at mitigating the negative effects of cancer caregiving have demonstrated some improvements in caregivers' distress, mood, QOL, coping, and self‐efficacy 3 ; however, results have been mixed 4,5 . These inconsistencies may be due to variations in the intervention content and timing used across these trials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%