1985
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3956(85)90056-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychotherapy for bulimia: A controlled study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with previous reviews, psychotherapy was defined as an intervention in which the central element was verbal communication between a client and a therapist, or as a psychological treatment in the form of a website or book which the participant worked through somewhat independently but with guided support from a therapist (e.g., Kolovos, Kleiboer, & Cuijpers, 2016). We excluded four studies because an effect size could not be calculated and the relevant data necessary for calculating an effect size could not be provided (Freeman, Barry, Dunkeld-Turnbull, & Henderson, 1988;Freeman, Sinclair, Turnbull, & Annandale, 1985;Mitchell et al, 2001;Ordman & Kirschenbaum, 1985). We excluded four studies because an effect size could not be calculated and the relevant data necessary for calculating an effect size could not be provided (Freeman, Barry, Dunkeld-Turnbull, & Henderson, 1988;Freeman, Sinclair, Turnbull, & Annandale, 1985;Mitchell et al, 2001;Ordman & Kirschenbaum, 1985).…”
Section: Inclusion Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistent with previous reviews, psychotherapy was defined as an intervention in which the central element was verbal communication between a client and a therapist, or as a psychological treatment in the form of a website or book which the participant worked through somewhat independently but with guided support from a therapist (e.g., Kolovos, Kleiboer, & Cuijpers, 2016). We excluded four studies because an effect size could not be calculated and the relevant data necessary for calculating an effect size could not be provided (Freeman, Barry, Dunkeld-Turnbull, & Henderson, 1988;Freeman, Sinclair, Turnbull, & Annandale, 1985;Mitchell et al, 2001;Ordman & Kirschenbaum, 1985). We excluded four studies because an effect size could not be calculated and the relevant data necessary for calculating an effect size could not be provided (Freeman, Barry, Dunkeld-Turnbull, & Henderson, 1988;Freeman, Sinclair, Turnbull, & Annandale, 1985;Mitchell et al, 2001;Ordman & Kirschenbaum, 1985).…”
Section: Inclusion Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants were recruited from out-patient clinics (Freeman et al 1985(Freeman et al , 1988Laessle et al 1987;Sundgot-Borgen et al 2002;Nevonen & Broberg, 2006), via advertisements (Kirkley et al 1985;Lee & Rush, 1986), out-patients and advertisements (Yates & Sambrailo, 1984;Leitenberg et al 1988;Wolf & Crowther, 1992) and from out-patients and general practitioners (Chen et al 2003). Studies were published between 1984 and 2006, with six out of 10 published in the 1980s.…”
Section: Studies and Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 5 Morgan-Russell dimensions already listed were used to evaluate clinical progress, scores being allocated on a 12point scale, with a high score indicating improved func¬ tioning. To assess overall progress, an average outcome score was calculated as the mean of scores on the 5 scales.…”
Section: Separate and Aggregated Clinical Dimensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%