1990
DOI: 10.1016/s0020-1693(00)83196-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pt(II)[(2,2′-bpy)(NCO)2] (2,2′-bpy = 2,2′-bipyridyl): an X-ray structure, NMR and FT-IR determination of pseudohalide bonding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
5
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
3
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has previously been shown that the 13 C chemical shifts of S- and N-bound thiocyanate are lower and higher than the value for ionic thiocyanate (134.0 ppm), respectively. , The shifts in both of the above complexes conform to this rule but are significantly greater than those in [Au(SCN) 2 ] - (116.3 ppm) or [Hg(SCN) 4 ] 2- (124.8 ppm) and are higher than those observed for a range of other diamagnetic S-bound thiocyanate complexes, while still remaining less than that for ionic thiocyanate. It has been claimed that the 13 C chemical shift of O-bound cyanate lies in the range 104−119 ppm, while that of N-bound cyanate occurs in the range 114−132 ppm. , The value observed in the present work for Hg 2 (NCO) 2 significantly extends the upper limit of the N-bound range to 138 ppm. The values reported for a number of other N-bound cyanate complexes lie below the value for ionic cyanate (127.9 ppm), , and Hg 2 (NCO) 2 is an unusual case in which the shift lies above this value.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has previously been shown that the 13 C chemical shifts of S- and N-bound thiocyanate are lower and higher than the value for ionic thiocyanate (134.0 ppm), respectively. , The shifts in both of the above complexes conform to this rule but are significantly greater than those in [Au(SCN) 2 ] - (116.3 ppm) or [Hg(SCN) 4 ] 2- (124.8 ppm) and are higher than those observed for a range of other diamagnetic S-bound thiocyanate complexes, while still remaining less than that for ionic thiocyanate. It has been claimed that the 13 C chemical shift of O-bound cyanate lies in the range 104−119 ppm, while that of N-bound cyanate occurs in the range 114−132 ppm. , The value observed in the present work for Hg 2 (NCO) 2 significantly extends the upper limit of the N-bound range to 138 ppm. The values reported for a number of other N-bound cyanate complexes lie below the value for ionic cyanate (127.9 ppm), , and Hg 2 (NCO) 2 is an unusual case in which the shift lies above this value.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…It has been claimed that the 13 C chemical shift of O-bound cyanate lies in the range 104−119 ppm, while that of N-bound cyanate occurs in the range 114−132 ppm. , The value observed in the present work for Hg 2 (NCO) 2 significantly extends the upper limit of the N-bound range to 138 ppm. The values reported for a number of other N-bound cyanate complexes lie below the value for ionic cyanate (127.9 ppm), , and Hg 2 (NCO) 2 is an unusual case in which the shift lies above this value.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Although there are many examples of such materials, we have found few structural reports of platinum(ID diimine compounds forming such chains [Osborn & Rogers, 1974;Che, He, Poon & Mak, 1989;Coyer, Herber & Cohen, 1990, 1991(see Marsh, 1994; Biedermann, Gliemann, Klement, Range & Zabel, 1990]. In all but one of these reported structures, successive platinum diimine molecules are rotated by 180 ° about the chain axis, so that eclipsing of the ligands is avoided and the Pt...Pt...Pt chain is slightly zigzag.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, platinum­(II) moieties in all six structures show an alternate arrangement of antiparallel and staggered packing patterns and stack the 1D “Pt wire” structure along the c axis (Figures and S3–S9). In contrast, only one kind of packing pattern (mainly antiparallel packing pattern) is usually adopted in the 1D “Pt wire” structure of small molecular platinum­(II) complexes such as Pt­(bpy)­Cl 2 , Pt­(bpm)­Cl 2 · 1 / 2 nmp, Pt­(bpy)­(NCS) 2 , Pt­(bpy)­(NCO) 2 , Pt­(bpy)­(CN) 2 , Pt­(bpm)­(CN) 2 ·DMF, Pt­(dmbpy)­(NCO) 2 , Pt­(phen)­(CN) 2 , and Pt­(bph)­(CO) 2 . It has been well-known that the staggered packing pattern of diimineplatinum­(II) complexes can effectively reduce the effect of steric hindrance of substituents during molecular stacking and is helpful for the formation of intermolecular Pt–Pt interactions. , Therefore, an alternate arrangement of two packing patterns is more conducive for a molecule containing larger sterically hindered substituents to construct a stable 1D “Pt wire” stacking structure.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, in most cases, the combination of a 1D “Pt wire” structure and other strategies to further reduce the emission energy of a platinum­(II) complex is mutually limited. As a result, the luminescence of most platinum­(II) complexes with a 1D “Pt wire” structure is still in the visible region. Therefore, the development of a new strategy to achieve high-efficiency long-wavelength NIR luminescence of a diimineplatinum­(II) complex is very important and necessary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%