2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2019.05.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pterosaur track assemblages from the Upper Jurassic (lower Kimmeridgian) intertidal deposits of Poland: Linking ichnites to potential trackmakers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The preservation of the pterosaur tracks in the intertidal environment indicates a fast burial, implying that the droppings preserved on the same surface were deposited at a similar time to the track formation. Furthermore, both the size and shape of the coprolites are very similar to the so far only described pterosaur coprolite (Hone et al, 2015) and the coprolite sizes match those of the footprint maker(s) at Wierzbica (Elgh, Pieńkowski & Niedźwiedzki, 2019). Taken together, these facts suggest that pterosaurs were most likely scat producers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The preservation of the pterosaur tracks in the intertidal environment indicates a fast burial, implying that the droppings preserved on the same surface were deposited at a similar time to the track formation. Furthermore, both the size and shape of the coprolites are very similar to the so far only described pterosaur coprolite (Hone et al, 2015) and the coprolite sizes match those of the footprint maker(s) at Wierzbica (Elgh, Pieńkowski & Niedźwiedzki, 2019). Taken together, these facts suggest that pterosaurs were most likely scat producers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…The combined evidence of the pterosaur tracks, which are possibly ctenochasmatid (Elgh, Pieńkowski & Niedźwiedzki, 2019), and the coprolites, which were most likely made by a filter feeder, leads us to conclude that filter-feeding ctenochasmatids were probable producers of both tracks and droppings. Our findings significantly expands the bromalite record for this pterosaur group, which was previously only known from gastroliths found in Pterodaustro (Codorniú, Chiappe & Cid, 2013), and lends further support to filter-feeding among these Jurassic taxa.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Milner & Lockley (2016) also proposed that size may be useful in discriminating between candidate trackmakers. Generally speaking, Late Jurassic pterosaur tracks are smaller in size (Lockley et al 1995; Lockley et al 2008; Elgh et al 2019), but there is one report from the Late Jurassic of Asturias that might also fit with ICNO.118 in terms of size (Lockley et al 2008). The track width of the traces of ICNO.118 (5.5–7.5 cm) might fit with the track width (8.5 cm) of specimen ICNO.62 assigned to Crocodylopodus isp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%