PsycTESTS Dataset 1993
DOI: 10.1037/t00503-000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PTSD Checklist--Specific Version

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
486
1
13

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 401 publications
(558 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
486
1
13
Order By: Relevance
“…Post-traumatic stress symptoms were assessed by the 17-item post-traumatic stress disorder checklist-civilian version (PCL-C), and a 5-point scoring system was employed ranging from 1 (not at all) to 5 (extremely) (Weathers, Litz, Herman, Huska, & Keane, 1994). Average values of the 17 items were calculated.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Post-traumatic stress symptoms were assessed by the 17-item post-traumatic stress disorder checklist-civilian version (PCL-C), and a 5-point scoring system was employed ranging from 1 (not at all) to 5 (extremely) (Weathers, Litz, Herman, Huska, & Keane, 1994). Average values of the 17 items were calculated.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PCL-5 is a self-report measure that was developed at the National Center for PTSD (Weathers, Litz, Herman, Huska, & Keane, 1994). It is used in conjunction with the Life Events Checklist for DSM-5 (LEC-5) (Gray, Litz, Hsu, & Lombardo, 2004).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Distress was assessed at Wave 1 using the 25-item Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL-25; Derogatis, Lipman, Rickels, Uhlenhut, & Cori, 1974) At Waves 2-6, distress was measured using the conceptually similar 18-item Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI-18; Derogatis & Savitz, 2000). Posttraumatic stress related to 9/11 was assessed at Wave 1 using the Impact of Events Scale-Revised (IES-R; Weiss & Marmar, 1997), and at Waves 2-6 using the conceptually similar PTSD Checklist (PCL; Weathers, Litz, Herman, Huska, & Keane, 1993). All well-being measures had excellent internal consistency at all waves (αs > .91).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%