2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10964-006-9101-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pubertal Development, Choice of Friends, and Smoking Initiation among Adolescent Males

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current results supported a full mediation effect of peer substance use for the both boys and girls. Although this is consistent with some studies (Lynne et al, 2007; Wichstrom, 2001) it is counter to other studies that only find mediating effects for either males or females (Drapela et al, 2006; Westling et al, 2008). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The current results supported a full mediation effect of peer substance use for the both boys and girls. Although this is consistent with some studies (Lynne et al, 2007; Wichstrom, 2001) it is counter to other studies that only find mediating effects for either males or females (Drapela et al, 2006; Westling et al, 2008). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Using the Add Health data, Drapela and colleagues (2006) found an indirect effect of early timing on smoking through peers’ smoking for boys. Wichstrom (2001) found the association between early puberty and substance use was partially mediated by friends’ problem behavior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature shows that maltreated youth have difficulty forming healthy peer relationships, are likely to be habitually rejected, and form more antisocial peer ties [31]. Thus, the association between early puberty and substance-using peers is not unexpected, albeit somewhat contrary to previous research that found mediation effects via substance-using peers in normative samples [9-11]. Based on the existing evidence, the assumption was that pathways involving peer-influence effects would also emerge for comparison adolescents.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The peer influence mechanism is supported by evidence showing that exposure to deviant peers, especially older or male peers, increases the delinquent behavior of early maturing girls [8]. Additionally, Drapela et al[9] found that peers’ smoking was a mediator between early timing and smoking in a two wave study of adolescent boys, whereas Wichstrom [10] found the association between early puberty and substance use to be mediated by peer problem behavior across two time points. More recent research revealed a longitudinal mediation effect of deviant peers on the association between pubertal timing and substance use for girls but not boys [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combining ages within a sample could mask the differences expected at the younger and older ages of the pubertal development process. For example, one study of adolescent males between the ages of 12 and 16 found that the correlation of stage-normative pubertal timing measured one year apart was .63 (Drapela, Gebelt, & McRee, 2006). Another study of adolescents aged 12 to 16 found that the correlation, this time measured two years apart, was strong and slightly different across gender (.82 for males and .87 for females; Wichstrom, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%