Public-Academic Collaboration in the Application of Evidence-Based Practice in Texas Mental Health System Redesign

Cook, Judith Α.; Ruggiero, Karen; Shore, Sam; Daggett, Pamela; Butler, Sarah B.

doi:10.2753/imh0020-7411360204

Cited by 8 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The involvement and recognition of key collaborators may well be the most fundamental factor contributing to the success of university-community projects (Cook, Ruggiero, Shore, Daggett, & Butler, 2007;Frazier, Abdul-Adil, Atkins, Gathright, & Jackson, 2007;Milofsky, 2006;Whipple, Solomon-Jozwiak, Williams-Hecksel, Abrams, & Bates, 2006). It thus seems increasingly important to find leaders throughout the community and engage and involve them to the fullest extent possible (Caldwell et al, 2005).…”

Section: Success Factors Versus Challenge Points: a New Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

Defining Factors of Successful University‐Community Collaborations: An Exploration of One Healthy Marriage Project

Carlton

Whiting²,

Bradford

et al. 2009

Family Relations

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study explored university‐community collaborations by examining the workings of 1 healthy marriage initiative. An ethnographic case study research strategy was used to study the process of this initiative, specifically looking at how participants worked through and overcame traditional university‐community collaboration challenges. Data consist of qualitative interviews with key initiative collaborators. Findings are organized into a model that offers a new way of looking at university‐community collaborations in light of challenge points to be addressed and either resolved or unresolved. The model provides implications for other collaborative efforts and outreach scholarship.

show abstract

Section: Success Factors Versus Challenge Points: a New Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

Defining Factors of Successful University‐Community Collaborations: An Exploration of One Healthy Marriage Project

Carlton

Whiting²,

Bradford

et al. 2009

Family Relations

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…There were no definitions or conceptualisation of public involvement in almost half of articles ( n = 43, 46.2%) [ 40 – 82 ]. Where reported, public participant numbers ranged from 4 [ 83 ], to an estimated 1200 [ 84 ], though no numbers were given in 13 articles (14.0%) [ 45 , 47 , 49 , 58 , 69 , 72 – 74 , 77 , 85 – 88 ], and incomplete or estimated numbers were provided in a further 25 (26.9%) [ 40 , 43 , 44 , 50 , 51 , 56 , 57 , 61 – 63 , 66 , 76 , 82 , 84 , 89 – 99 ]. Some authors provided demographic data of public participants, such as age, gender, medical condition and/or race, however, there was no detail provided in more than half of articles ( n = 52, 55.9%) [ 37 , 38 , 40 , 41 , 43 – 51 , 55 , 58 , 59 , 61 , 63 , 66 , 68 , 69 , 71 – 74 , 77 , 79 , 81 – 88 , 93 , 95 – 110 ].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Data were collected through interviews [ 38 , 42 , 44 , 45 , 58 , 59 , 62 , 65 , 72 , 80 , 81 , 84 , 87 , 93 , 100 , 105 , 109 , 123 , 138 ], focus groups [ 44 , 45 , 62 , 70 , 136 ], questionnaires or surveys [ 42 , 45 , 48 , 59 , 62 , 66 , 84 , 100 ], evaluation forms [ 92 ], online collection of comments [ 70 ], and a yarning circle, “..a culturally-appropriate form of group discussion …” ([ 93 ], p.5). In one study, it was noted that “ …researchers spoke with consumers and other advocates…to elicit their opinions about how the public mental health system has changed” ([ 49 ], p.46). Stakeholder views were rarely measured using standardized tools, with the exception of the study by Cook et al [ 85 ], which used the Client Services Questionnaire in a subsequent randomized controlled trial [ 139 ].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Data on indicators such as service usage, treatment uptake, client/patient attendance, and morbidity were frequently reported [ 47 – 49 , 54 , 65 , 68 , 69 , 85 , 92 , 93 , 99 , 102 ]. Evaluations of feasibility, usability, and user acceptance were common in studies designing e-health products [ 42 , 45 , 57 , 135 – 137 ].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Evaluating health service outcomes of public involvement in health service design in high-income countries: a systematic review

Lloyd

Kenny

Hyett

2021

BMC Health Serv Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Internationally, it is expected that health services will involve the public in health service design. Evaluation of public involvement has typically focused on the process and experiences for participants. Less is known about outcomes for health services. The aim of this systematic review was to a) identify and synthesise what is known about health service outcomes of public involvement and b) document how outcomes were evaluated. Methods Searches were undertaken in MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and CINAHL for studies that reported health service outcomes from public involvement in health service design. The review was limited to high-income countries and studies in English. Study quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool and critical appraisal guidelines for assessing the quality and impact of user involvement in health research. Content analysis was used to determine the outcomes of public involvement in health service design and how outcomes were evaluated. Results A total of 93 articles were included. The majority were published in the last 5 years, were qualitative, and were located in the United Kingdom. A range of health service outcomes (discrete products, improvements to health services and system/policy level changes) were reported at various levels (service level, across services, and across organisations). However, evaluations of outcomes were reported in less than half of studies. In studies where outcomes were evaluated, a range of methods were used; most frequent were mixed methods. The quality of study design and reporting was inconsistent. Conclusion When reporting public involvement in health service design authors outline a range of outcomes for health services, but it is challenging to determine the extent of outcomes due to inadequate descriptions of study design and poor reporting. There is an urgent need for evaluations, including longitudinal study designs and cost-benefit analyses, to fully understand outcomes from public involvement in health service design.

show abstract

“…Information regarding participant characteristics and outcomes was obtained during baseline, 12-month, and 24-month telephone interviews. Utilization and cost data for traditional behavioral health services were obtained from the state's electronic data warehouse (34), and data for nontraditional services costs came from the self-directed care program's electronic administrative files. Client satisfaction data were gathered at the 12-and 24-month telephone interviews.…”

Section: Study Proceduresmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mental Health Self-Directed Care Financing: Efficacy in Improving Outcomes and Controlling Costs for Adults With Serious Mental Illness

Cook

Shore

Burke-Miller

et al. 2019

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Self-directed care allows individuals with disabilities and elderly persons to control public funds to purchase goods and services that help them remain outside institutional settings. This study examined effects on outcomes, service costs, and user satisfaction among adults with serious mental illness. Methods: Public mental health system clients were randomly assigned to self-directed care (N=114) versus services as usual (N=102) and assessed at baseline and 12 and 24 months. The primary outcome was self-perceived recovery. Secondary outcomes included psychosocial status, psychiatric symptom severity, and behavioral rehabilitation indicators. Mixedeffects random-regression analysis tested for longitudinal changes in outcomes between the two conditions. Differences in service costs were analyzed with negative binomial and zero-inflated negative binomial regression models. Results: Compared with the control group, self-directed care participants had significantly greater improvement over time in recovery, self-esteem, coping mastery, autonomy support, somatic symptoms, employment, and education. No betweengroup differences were found in total per-person service costs in years 1 and 2 or both years combined. However, selfdirected care participants were more likely than control group participants to have zero costs for six of 12 individual services and to have lower costs for four. The most frequent nontraditional purchases were for transportation (21%), communication (17%), medical care (15%), residential (14%), and health and wellness needs (11%). Client satisfaction with mental health services was significantly higher among intervention participants, compared with control participants, at both follow-ups. Conclusions: The budget-neutral self-directed care model achieved superior client outcomes and greater satisfaction with mental health care, compared with services as usual.

show abstract

Public-Academic Collaboration in the Application of Evidence-Based Practice in Texas Mental Health System Redesign

Cited by 8 publications

References 8 publications

Defining Factors of Successful University‐Community Collaborations: An Exploration of One Healthy Marriage Project

Defining Factors of Successful University‐Community Collaborations: An Exploration of One Healthy Marriage Project

Evaluating health service outcomes of public involvement in health service design in high-income countries: a systematic review

Mental Health Self-Directed Care Financing: Efficacy in Improving Outcomes and Controlling Costs for Adults With Serious Mental Illness

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About