Public Accountability System: Empirical Assessment of Public Sector of Malaysia

Abstract

This study assesses the status of accountability practices of the Malaysian public sector in response to the recent report of the Auditor General that revealed corruption, weakness and lack of control in asset management. Primary data was collected using a questionnaire distributed through Google Docs application to the heads of 682 departments and agencies under 24 federal ministries, including the Prime Minister Department. The final sample of the study consists of 109 respondents. The data gathered were based on the opinions of respondents on the 10 factors of public accountability practices in their respective departments or agencies using a seven-point Likert scale that ranged from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and factor analysis. Data reliability was tested using Cronbach's alpha test. Data validity and normality were tested using the Shapiro Wilk's test. About 87.3% of the respondents indicated that their departments and agencies generally implement accountability practices. However, priority accountability factor differs among service schemes. Accountability in administrative and diplomatic, education and medical and health services is below the overall average. The study findings are useful in providing awareness to policy makers and in encouraging accountability environments in many countries, especially Malaysia.

E-Government Effect on Participatory Democracy in the Maghreb: Indirect Effect and Government-Led Participation

“…For transparency, we have adopted the measurement from Kim and Lee [59]. For accountability, we have adopted the measurement of Said et al [60].…”

How strong is the integrity disclosure in Indonesian Province website?

“…The government should have taken the initiative in the attempt to uphold the integrity and achieve good governance. Khalid et al (2016) and Said et al (2015) stated several examples of initiatives that can be carried out to provide integrity, accountability, enhance positive value, and provide excellent services. These are clean, efficient, and trustworthy aspects that can be implemented in an organization's objective statement and vision and mission, and excellent work culture and code of work ethics that lead the members of the organization to behave and work according to ethical ethics and have an embedded moral value.…”

Reasons for Non-Disclosure of Accountability Practices Information on the Website of Malaysian Local Governments

“…The increasing use of accountability concept in diverse disciplines (Lindberg, 2009) shows that the concept is relevant to be continuously explored by scholars. Studies in public sector on the accountability from different aspects such as disclosure practices (Shahib & Risky, 2017;Abu Bakar, 2013), accountability status assessment (Said et al, 2015), determinants of accountability (Halaby & Hussainey, 2015) as well as challenges to accountability (Mohamad et al, 2013) have been examined in prior studies. Accountability is an element of good governance and foundation of trust in public sector.…”