1994
DOI: 10.2307/2152627
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Public and Private Sanctions Against South Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is, however, a related literature that provides some predictions as to when states will be successful in influencing private actors to work on their behalf, although it has less to say about when they will want to work through private actors in the first place. This small but important body of work borrows from both sanctions theory (Rodman 1994, Shambaugh 1996 and comparative politics, examining how market power and domestic institutions affect the ability of states to influence private actors. Different modes of state-private actor interaction are likely to be associated not only with differences in the domestic political economy (Lütz 2003, Newman & Bach 2004 but also with variation in international outcomes (Rodman 1994;Shambaugh 1996;Farrell 2003b;D.…”
Section: International Relations and Nonstate Actorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is, however, a related literature that provides some predictions as to when states will be successful in influencing private actors to work on their behalf, although it has less to say about when they will want to work through private actors in the first place. This small but important body of work borrows from both sanctions theory (Rodman 1994, Shambaugh 1996 and comparative politics, examining how market power and domestic institutions affect the ability of states to influence private actors. Different modes of state-private actor interaction are likely to be associated not only with differences in the domestic political economy (Lütz 2003, Newman & Bach 2004 but also with variation in international outcomes (Rodman 1994;Shambaugh 1996;Farrell 2003b;D.…”
Section: International Relations and Nonstate Actorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is however, a related literature that provides some predictions as to the circumstances under which states will be successful in influencing private actors to work on their behalf, even if it has less to say about when they will want to work through private actors in the first place. This small but important body of work borrows from both from sanctions theory (Rodman 1994, Shambaugh 1996 and comparative politics, examining how market power and domestic institutions affect the ability of states to influence private actors. Different modes of state-private actor interaction are not only likely to be associated with differences in the domestic political economy (Lütz 2003, Newman & Bach 2004, but also with variation in international outcomes (Rodman 1994, Shambaugh 1996, Farrell 2003b, Bach & Newman 2003, Mattli & Büthe 2004.…”
Section: International Relations and Non-state Actorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This small but important body of work borrows from both from sanctions theory (Rodman 1994, Shambaugh 1996 and comparative politics, examining how market power and domestic institutions affect the ability of states to influence private actors. Different modes of state-private actor interaction are not only likely to be associated with differences in the domestic political economy (Lütz 2003, Newman & Bach 2004, but also with variation in international outcomes (Rodman 1994, Shambaugh 1996, Farrell 2003b, Bach & Newman 2003, Mattli & Büthe 2004. Kenneth Rodman (1994) argues that the power of both political authorities and non governmental organizations to make multinational corporations disengage from South Africa was limited, because they could offer only inducements, not commands.…”
Section: International Relations and Non-state Actorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Between 1985 and 1990, for example, the volume of imports and exports both increased by about 10%, and the country continued to run a current account surplus (albeit a declining one). Sanctions did, however, affect international business confidence: more than half of the multinational corporations with investments in South Africa sold their holdings; new direct foreign investment essentially ceased; and money centre banks became extremely wary about extending credit to either the South African public or private sector (Rodman, 1994). South Africa's estimated GDP grew sluggishly after the onset of international sanctions, and estimated per capita GDP actually declined slightly (by about 4%) between 1985 and 1990 (all figures derived from International Monetary Fund, 1995, p. 697).…”
Section: Trade Shocks Trade Sanctions and Economic Blockadesmentioning
confidence: 99%