Personal Carbon Trading 2017
DOI: 10.4324/9781849776721-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Public attitudes to personal carbon allowances: findings from a mixed-method study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most research on PCT focuses on equity, effectiveness, public acceptability, barriers to implementation and its potential advantages over the existing climate policy instruments, such as upstream "cap and trade" systems and carbon taxes (Harwatt, 2008;Jagers, 2010;Eyre, 2010;Bristow et al, 2010;Parag and Eyre, 2010;Fawcett et al, 2007;Wallace et al, 2010;Sorrell, 2010;Parag et al, 2011;Wadud, 2011;Starkey, 2012). Compared with a simple tax system the costs of PCT, which include implementation cost, participation cost and transaction cost, may be higher (Fawcett, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most research on PCT focuses on equity, effectiveness, public acceptability, barriers to implementation and its potential advantages over the existing climate policy instruments, such as upstream "cap and trade" systems and carbon taxes (Harwatt, 2008;Jagers, 2010;Eyre, 2010;Bristow et al, 2010;Parag and Eyre, 2010;Fawcett et al, 2007;Wallace et al, 2010;Sorrell, 2010;Parag et al, 2011;Wadud, 2011;Starkey, 2012). Compared with a simple tax system the costs of PCT, which include implementation cost, participation cost and transaction cost, may be higher (Fawcett, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PCT is a novel carbon abatement policy instrument, which has not yet been fully developed in theory and never been implemented in practice due to its high transaction costs (Fawcett and Parag []). Most studies of PCT focus on equity, effectiveness, public acceptability, barriers to implementation, and its potential advantages compared with the existing climate policy instruments, such as upstream “cap and trade” systems and carbon taxes (Harwatt [], Bristow et al [], Eyre [], Wallace et al [], Parag et al [], Wadud [], Starkey []).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The government had ambitious carbon reduction goals and the PCT concept was explored, inspired by the belief that it is a policy that reduces emissions in an efficient and fair way (Fawcett 2010). Studies on social feasibility find support levels of around 25-40% (Owen et al 2008;Wallace et al 2010), up to 80% (Bristow et al 2010). These levels are relatively high given the radical novelty of the concept.…”
Section: Literature On the Feasibility Of Tradable Creditsmentioning
confidence: 99%