Public attitudes to the use of remote data collection in clinical research

Abstract

Background/aims Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has presented an unprecedented challenge for delivering clinical research. The use of technology-assisted data collection for clinical research is desirable for many practitioners, but the acceptability of use in the general population has not been assessed. The aim of the study was to assess attitudes towards using technology-assisted remote methods in the delivery of clinical research in the UK and to understand the barriers to taking part in research with respect to both remote assessments and traditional research methods across different age ranges. Methods The study was conducted as an online anonymous survey with a 4-part questionnaire, between August 2020 and December 2020. Participants living in the UK aged 18 years and above were eligible to take part. Results A total 351 completed the survey and are included in the data analysis. In all age groups, participants identified that use of online assignments, video calls and telephone calls would make them more likely to take part in clinical research. Overall, the largest barrier to taking part in research was time commitments and timing of the appointment. COVID-19 has had a small, positive influence on the confidence of using technology in the general population. Conclusions The study found that there is a large interest in taking part in research using online, telephone and video call appointments, which could facilitate research delivery in light of ongoing COVID-19-related restrictions and also improve the accessibility and inclusivity of research.

Field based research in the era of the pandemic in resource limited settings: challenges and lessons for the future

“…Progress of studies requiring in person follow ups can be expected to be hampered similarly. Transport and distance related concerns have always been barriers to participating in field based research that have been further compounded during the pandemic times ( 32 ).…”

Matching science to reality: how to deploy a participant-driven digital brain health platform

“…Longitudinal research paradigms generally involve in-clinic methodologies administered at various time points for the duration of the study period (Andersson et al, 2019). The ongoing pandemic caused an unprecedented transformation, which led to the implementation of telehealth and remote testing that exposed gaps in traditional research frameworks (Neumann et al, 2021), the utility of remote assessment to increase participation, and the potential of technology to improve the feasibility of observational studies. Internet-connected applications and devices can enable a patient-driven focus that, combined with data-driven science, can offer better opportunities for healthcare providers to access realtime clinical information from patients and result in the collection of precision-health data that can better inform treatment strategies (Leth et al, 2017).…”

Virtual engagement of under-resourced communities: Lessons learned during the COVID-19 pandemic for creating crisis-resistant research infrastructure

“…The COVID-19 pandemic is a public health crisis that has presented numerous challenges to conducting research, particularly community-engaged research. Notably, the transition to digital methods is problematic due to the potential to disrupt participation in research that has traditionally relied on face-to-face contact [1].…”