2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.scijus.2020.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Public beliefs about the accuracy and importance of forensic evidence in the United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, laboratories have independent interpretation guidelines, and these organizational guidelines affect the interpretation of complex DNA mixtures (Alexander, 2014;Dror & Hampikian, 2011). Procedural and operational misconduct can therefore occur in all phases, during the collection, assessment, and interpretation of physical evidence (e.g., Kaplan et al, 2020;Rebeiro et al, 2019). In addition, human errors can bias people's judgments even regarding CCTV evidence (e.g., overestimation, discrimination, and lack of awareness of actual accuracy; Granot et al, 2018).…”
Section: Evidence and Human Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, laboratories have independent interpretation guidelines, and these organizational guidelines affect the interpretation of complex DNA mixtures (Alexander, 2014;Dror & Hampikian, 2011). Procedural and operational misconduct can therefore occur in all phases, during the collection, assessment, and interpretation of physical evidence (e.g., Kaplan et al, 2020;Rebeiro et al, 2019). In addition, human errors can bias people's judgments even regarding CCTV evidence (e.g., overestimation, discrimination, and lack of awareness of actual accuracy; Granot et al, 2018).…”
Section: Evidence and Human Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may be useful to examine this definition more closely. In the literature, many researchers have used the reliability of evidence as either an independent or dependent variable (Ask & Granhag, 2007;Ask et al, 2011;Golding et al, 2000;Kaplan et al, 2020;Lieberman et al, 2008;Maeder et al, 2017;Martire et al, 2019;Ribeiro et al, 2019;Schklar & Diamond, 1999). I observed that previous studies had adopted diverse definitions of evidence reliability (e.g., credibility, error rate, and accuracy).…”
Section: Evidence Reliabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence is used to aid in the solving of a case, to develop leads, provide or eliminate suspects, establish a connection to the suspect, establish matches such as tool marks, residue etc., substantiate a theory of the case and establish the device designer's "signature" [1,2]. The post-blast residue analysis gives information on the origin of the explosives used in the preparation of a bomb and gives law enforcement a specific direction for investigation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sometimes as professionals or public perception, others related to forensic techniques used. [4][5][6][7] Most of the studies did not comprise the pharmacist. Moreover, the authors are not familiar with any investigation about pharmacists' perception of forensic pharmacy in Saudi Arabia, Gulf and Middle East countries, or the rest of the world.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%