2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11127-018-0584-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Public debt stabilization: the relevance of policymakers’ time horizons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, government collectively fails to internalize the future cost of present programs and leaves debts to the coming government when it expects to lose an election (Alesina & Tabellini, 1990; Di Bartolomeo et al, 2018). In a federal system, Weingast et al (1981, p. 643) demonstrate that legislative decisions to fund programs, where benefits are concentrated on an electoral district while costs are dispersed across districts, result in a higher level of government spending than is economically optimal.…”
Section: Political Incentives To Government Spendingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, government collectively fails to internalize the future cost of present programs and leaves debts to the coming government when it expects to lose an election (Alesina & Tabellini, 1990; Di Bartolomeo et al, 2018). In a federal system, Weingast et al (1981, p. 643) demonstrate that legislative decisions to fund programs, where benefits are concentrated on an electoral district while costs are dispersed across districts, result in a higher level of government spending than is economically optimal.…”
Section: Political Incentives To Government Spendingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They show that information exchange between policy makers can be welfare improving if the social loss function is a concave combination of the policymakers’ loss functions. Finally, Di Bartolomeo, Saltari, and Semmler () use NMPC to model a nonlinear debt‐stabilization game based on endogenous risk premia on fiscal debt. They model a noncooperative scenario with a core country, a periphery country, and a central bank in a three player game.…”
Section: Modeling a Cooperative Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their loss functions take economic, financial, and fiscal stability into account. Di Bartolomeo, Saltari, and Semmler () show that a cooperative game is superior to a noncooperative game with respect to fiscal debt stabilization. They also demonstrate that a short decision horizon of policy makers is inferior compared to a long decision horizon for debt stabilization.…”
Section: Modeling a Cooperative Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations