Public Demand for Extraterritorial Environmental and Social Public Goods Provision

Abstract

Vastly increased transnational business activity in recent decades has been accompanied by controversy over how to cope with its social and environmental impacts. The most prominent policy response thus far consists of international guidelines. We investigate to what extent and why citizens in a high-income country are willing to restrain companies to improve environmental and social conditions in other countries. Exploiting a real-world referendum in Switzerland, we use choice and vignette experiments with a representative sample of voters (N = 3,010) to study public demand for such regulation. Our results show that citizens prefer strict and unilateral rules (with a substantial variation of preferences by general social and environmental concern) while correctly assessing their consequences. Moreover, exposure to international norms increases demand for regulation. These findings highlight that democratic accountability can be a mechanism that motivates states to contribute to collective goods even if not in their economic interest and that awareness of relevant international norms among citizens can enhance this mechanism.

Deontological and consequentialist preferences towards arms exports: A comparative conjoint experiment in France and Germany

“…On the one hand, our results indicate that deontologist preferences could be an overlooked aspect of public opinion on foreign policy making, at least whenever deadly force is in question. On the other hand, our arguments and results are associated with recent findings in related areas where (domestic) economic benefits, security and normative considerations interact (albeit to varying degrees) – for example, decisions on military interventions (Dill & Schubiger, 2021; Tomz & Weeks, 2020), provision of foreign aid (Heinrich et al., 2018), international trade (Lechner, 2016) or foreign direct investment (Rudolph, Kolcava, et al., 2023).…”

How relevant is NIMBYism in public goods provision? Experimental insights from 5G antenna placement in Switzerland

“…Moreover, we contribute to recent research investigating how non-material interests shape the preferences of individuals on public goods provision. Recent research has focused on other-regarding concerns/preferences (Rudolph, Kolcava and Bernauer 2022;Bechtel, Genovese and Scheve 2019). Our paper indicates that perceived costs can have important non-material elements as well, in our case perceptions of health risks (in addition to material costs (Rho and Tomz 2017)).…”

How Does an Economic Shock Affect Environmental Attitudes, Preferences and Issue Importance? Evidence from Switzerland

“…This decrease could be a consequence of the economic shock driven by sociotropic considerations of citizens (Beiser-McGrath 2022), but might be due to time confounding, also. Future research could investigate the role of such sociotropic considerations, which have been found to matter in related areas such as trade policy (Schaffer and Spilker 2019) or sustainable supply chains (Rudolph, Kolcava, and Bernauer 2022).…”