2022
DOI: 10.1111/1475-679x.12411
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Public Firm Presence, Financial Reporting, and the Decline of U.S. Manufacturing

Abstract: We examine the relation between public firm presence and import competition. The information created by public firm presence may provide importers with insights they can use for competing with domestic firms. Consistent with this possibility, we document a positive relation between public firm presence and import competition. We find similar results when using differences in the expected costs of the Sarbanes‐Oxley Act as a source of plausibly exogenous variation in public firm presence after the act. We use d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although facts assembled by descriptive studies alone do not provide deeper or generalizable insights, particularly robust and important facts can provide an input into theory development. For example, mounting descriptive evidence shows disclosure regulation appears to hurt some firms' competitive position and innovation incentives (e.g., Bernard [2016], Breuer [2021], Glaeser and Omartian [2022], Berger, Choi, and Tomar [2024]). Such robust evidence calls for the development of theoretical models to shed light on the implications of disclosure regulation on innovation incentives and its welfare implications.…”
Section: Empirical Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although facts assembled by descriptive studies alone do not provide deeper or generalizable insights, particularly robust and important facts can provide an input into theory development. For example, mounting descriptive evidence shows disclosure regulation appears to hurt some firms' competitive position and innovation incentives (e.g., Bernard [2016], Breuer [2021], Glaeser and Omartian [2022], Berger, Choi, and Tomar [2024]). Such robust evidence calls for the development of theoretical models to shed light on the implications of disclosure regulation on innovation incentives and its welfare implications.…”
Section: Empirical Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, we test whether our results for RQ2 vary with the overall quality of listing firms' industry information environment. Intra‐industry information spillovers play an important role in capital markets generally and studies also show that peer firms' financial disclosures play a key role in shaping a firms' overall industry information environment (Glaeser & Omartian, 2022).…”
Section: Cross‐sectional Analyses For Rq2: Understanding Why Underwri...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A key alternative source of information investors use in this setting is public disclosures made by industry peer firms (e.g., see Bourveau et al, 2022). Higher quality peer firm disclosures result in a richer overall industry information environment (Glaeser & Omartian, 2022), which can help investors value newly listed firms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…My study is most closely related to the emerging literature on the real effects of peer firm disclosure. Several recent studies examine the real effects of firms’ financial statements on peer firms’ investments, market entry, and innovation (Badertscher, Shroff, and White [2013], Beatty, Liao, and Yu [2013], Li [2016], Durnev and Mangen [2020], Cho and Muslu [2021], Breuer, Leuz, and Vanhaverbeke [2022], Glaeser and Omartian [2022], Zou [2022], Chen et al. [2023], Kim and Valentine [2023]).…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%