Public goods in Michael Oakeshott’s ‘world of pragmata’

Abstract

Michael Oakeshott’s account of political economy is claimed to have found its ‘apotheosis under Thatcherism’. Against critics who align him with a preference for small government, this article points to Oakeshott’s stress on the indispensability of an infrastructure of government-provided public goods, in which individual agency and associative freedom can flourish. I argue that Oakeshott’s account of political economy invites a contestatory politics over three types of public goods, which epitomize the unresolvable tension he diagnosed between nomocratic and teleocratic conceptions of the modern state. These three types are the system of civil law, the by-products of the operation of civil law and public goods which result from policies. The article concludes that Oakeshott offers an important corrective to political theories which favour either market mediation or radical democratic governance of the commons as self-sustaining modes of providing and enjoying goods.

Public Goods and the Commons: Opposites or Complements?

“…84 A compatibilist account need not deny the primacy of public infrastructure or shy away from pointing out that the commons (much like markets) are ultimately not as "self-governing" or "self-organizing" as their proponents claim. 85 When Tully claims that public goods do not merely "enhance" or enable but "make possible" common forms of life, he effectively admits as much.…”