Public health economics: a systematic review of guidance for the economic evaluation of public health interventions and discussion of key methodological issues

Abstract

BackgroundIf Public Health is the science and art of how society collectively aims to improve health, and reduce inequalities in health, then Public Health Economics is the science and art of supporting decision making as to how society can use its available resources to best meet these objectives and minimise opportunity cost. A systematic review of published guidance for the economic evaluation of public health interventions within this broad public policy paradigm was conducted.MethodsElectronic databases and organisation websites were searched using a 22 year time horizon (1990–2012). References of papers were hand searched for additional papers for inclusion. Government reports or peer-reviewed published papers were included if they; referred to the methods of economic evaluation of public health interventions, identified key challenges of conducting economic evaluations of public health interventions or made recommendations for conducting economic evaluations of public health interventions. Guidance was divided into three categories UK guidance, international guidance and observations or guidance provided by individual commentators in the field of public health economics. An assessment of the theoretical frameworks underpinning the guidance was made and served as a rationale for categorising the papers.ResultsWe identified 5 international guidance documents, 7 UK guidance documents and 4 documents by individual commentators. The papers reviewed identify the main methodological challenges that face analysts when conducting such evaluations. There is a consensus within the guidance that wider social and environmental costs and benefits should be looked at due to the complex nature of public health. This was reflected in the theoretical underpinning as the majority of guidance was categorised as extra-welfarist.ConclusionsIn this novel review we argue that health economics may have come full circle from its roots in broad public policy economics. We may find it useful to think in this broader paradigm with respect to public health economics. We offer a 12 point checklist to support government, NHS commissioners and individual health economists in their consideration of economic evaluation methodology with respect to the additional challenges of applying health economics to public health.

Are the eating habits of university students different to the rest of the Spanish population? Food availability, consumption and cost

“…The eating habits of young people informs us about the future demand for food as well as the possibility that the incidence of certain illnesses related to diets rich in fat will increase. Knowing why certain foods and not others are consumed is relevant to design nutritional policies (Edwards et al, 2013); to develop and promote policies by the stakeholders in the food market and to increase consumer demand for all Mediterranean products.…”

Re‐Thinking ‘The Different Perspectives That can be Used When Eliciting Preferences in Health’

“…Recent years have seen increased interest in applying the evaluation methods used for health care to public health interventions (Edwards et al, 2013). Public health programmes aim to have a range of outcomes that need to be valued when the programme is evaluated.…”

Evaluación económica del impacto de la prohibición de plomo en las gasolinas en el cociente intelectual de los niños de 7 y 8 años de la Comunidad de Madrid

“…Además, los beneficios de las políticas públicas tienen un componente importante de externalidad, es decir, afectan a muchas personas sin mediar el mecanismo del mercado, lo que hace muy difícil su medida y valoración adecuadas 44 . Además, hay problemas metodológi-cos específicos en la evaluación económica de las políticas de salud pública debidos a la complejidad de la salud pública en sí mismas: la nada fácil cuestión de la atribución de los efectos a las políticas, la dificultad de realizar ensayos aleatorios controlados así como el carácter intersectorial de muchas políticas, que requieren una consideración más amplia de los costes y beneficios que recaen sobre otros sectores diferentes al sanitario 45,46 . Esta ausencia podría explicar la escasa importancia que reciben las políticas de salud pública en relación con las políticas asistenciales, que generalmente cuentan con evaluaciones de eficacia y, en muchos casos, con evaluaciones económicas de coste efectividad.…”