1988
DOI: 10.2747/0272-3638.9.6.584
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Public Housing as a Device for White Residential Segregation in Johannesburg, 1934–1953

Abstract: Public housing for whites in South Africa was introduced as an urban-segregation measure in the 1930s. The state's aim in establishing Council housing in Johannesburg is shown to have been the racial division of the residences of working-class people. The white-housing program is assessed and shown to be wanting. It is argued that, particularly in the post-World War II years, housing assistance for whites failed to ensure the racial segregation of the slum or to accomplish the social uplifting of all poor whit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In local government there is a highly skewed legacy of state assistance based on race. Under the de facto welfare state that operated for whites, basic municipal services including water, electricity and rates were rebated or subsidized so that the needs of the poor were addressed (Parnell, 1988). The post‐apartheid city challenge is to roll out these services (on which human rights depend) to all urban residents.…”
Section: Municipal Subsidies and The Right To Affordable Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In local government there is a highly skewed legacy of state assistance based on race. Under the de facto welfare state that operated for whites, basic municipal services including water, electricity and rates were rebated or subsidized so that the needs of the poor were addressed (Parnell, 1988). The post‐apartheid city challenge is to roll out these services (on which human rights depend) to all urban residents.…”
Section: Municipal Subsidies and The Right To Affordable Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their population, today predominantly poor and black, is quite diverse (Table 13.1). In Bertrams, for example, Indian, coloured and Afrikaner minorities (Rule 1989) live in the municipal houses formerly reserved for poor whites (Parnell 1988). In Yeoville, the racial profile is more homogeneously black but socio-economic diversity is higher.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%