1980
DOI: 10.1002/1520-6807(198010)17:4<491::aid-pits2310170413>3.0.co;2-m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Public law 94–142: Practicing school psychologists' perceptions of how this law affects them

Abstract: A questionnaire regarding PL 94-142 and its effects upon the practice of school psychology was developed and mailed to 389 members of the National Association of School Psychologists. Information regarding professional training, years of experience, and type of service system was obtained for the purpose of various group comparisons. Age, sex, number of years of experience, and type of service system were specifically chosen for statistical analysis. Overall results suggested two relatively divergent views exp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1983
1983
1983
1983

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We are not suggesting that a teacher pretend to have the training or skills of a certified psychologist. Teachers should be aware that PL94-142 redefined some of the roles of the school psychologist (Ysseldyke, 1978;Stevenson-Hicks, 1980), and it also made the psychologist more a colleague of the teacher and less of an Olympian demigod hurling diagnostic fiats from his remote lair. Special educators should be as familiar with the definitions of ED as they are with the definitions of LD and should be able to apply those definitions to the child they have helped evaluate or have observed.…”
Section: Prologuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We are not suggesting that a teacher pretend to have the training or skills of a certified psychologist. Teachers should be aware that PL94-142 redefined some of the roles of the school psychologist (Ysseldyke, 1978;Stevenson-Hicks, 1980), and it also made the psychologist more a colleague of the teacher and less of an Olympian demigod hurling diagnostic fiats from his remote lair. Special educators should be as familiar with the definitions of ED as they are with the definitions of LD and should be able to apply those definitions to the child they have helped evaluate or have observed.…”
Section: Prologuementioning
confidence: 99%