2020
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3888180
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Public Law Enforcement under Ambiguity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prior history of federal programs, resource availability, state wealth, or geographic location did not appear to have a substantial impact on policy formation, but there are some indicators that other elements may become relevant in the following stage of legislation implementation, policy acceptance [12]. It indicates that several variables such as an inadequate resources [27], corruption [28], insufficient knowledge, ambiguity about law enforcement [29], a willingness on the part [30], and low confidence [31] are influencing progress in the application of cybersecurity regulations. These elements are detailed more below.…”
Section: Factors Influencing Implementation Of Cybersecurity Lawmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Prior history of federal programs, resource availability, state wealth, or geographic location did not appear to have a substantial impact on policy formation, but there are some indicators that other elements may become relevant in the following stage of legislation implementation, policy acceptance [12]. It indicates that several variables such as an inadequate resources [27], corruption [28], insufficient knowledge, ambiguity about law enforcement [29], a willingness on the part [30], and low confidence [31] are influencing progress in the application of cybersecurity regulations. These elements are detailed more below.…”
Section: Factors Influencing Implementation Of Cybersecurity Lawmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assume Mr. X and Mr. Y perform the same offense under the same conditions. If Mr. X receives a 5-year sentence and Mr. Y receives a 3-year term, the disparity appears to be highly harsh [29].…”
Section: Ambiguity and Law Enforcementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, Teichman (2011) offers a survey of the behavioral economics of crime in which he notes that offsetting biases and unobservable risk preferences on the part of offenders lead to conflicting predictions regarding the impact of less certain punishment regimes. Moreover, Chopard and Obidzinski (2021) examine the implications for law enforcement policy of the resulting “decisions under ambiguity” by criminal offenders. These types of psychological factors and biases can affect perceived probabilities of apprehension, as well as the updating of those perceptions in response to experience (Apel, 2022).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%