2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2017.08.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Public participation GIS for assessing landscape values and improvement preferences in urban stream corridors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, it has been reported that provisioning services are also valued with other types of services: for instance, the bundle of services perceived as vulnerable by local residents of a Spanish protected area comprised provisioning services and some cultural services such as recreational hunting (Iniesta-Arandia et al 2014);Hicks and Cinner (2014) have shown that fishers in Tanzania prioritise fishing, bequest and culture together (Hicks and Cinner 2014);Brown et al (2015a) have reported that forested areas in the Norwegian regions of Nordland and Sogn are perceived to provide multiple bundles supporting both recreation-related and provisioning values(Brown et al 2015a). The specific bundles of ecosystem services that stakeholders value together are mediated by various factors, such as access mechanisms(Hicks and Cinner 2014) or placebased constructs(Garcia et al 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, it has been reported that provisioning services are also valued with other types of services: for instance, the bundle of services perceived as vulnerable by local residents of a Spanish protected area comprised provisioning services and some cultural services such as recreational hunting (Iniesta-Arandia et al 2014);Hicks and Cinner (2014) have shown that fishers in Tanzania prioritise fishing, bequest and culture together (Hicks and Cinner 2014);Brown et al (2015a) have reported that forested areas in the Norwegian regions of Nordland and Sogn are perceived to provide multiple bundles supporting both recreation-related and provisioning values(Brown et al 2015a). The specific bundles of ecosystem services that stakeholders value together are mediated by various factors, such as access mechanisms(Hicks and Cinner 2014) or placebased constructs(Garcia et al 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, with the support of GIS techniques, spatial decision-making has been further examined in the process of territory planning and identifying priorities in development strategies [6,12,49]. Integrating spatial analysis allows in-depth investigating the interrelation between social-cultural perception and place-based values, which therefore reinforces the efficiency of development strategies [10]. The approach allows considering the transformation of…”
Section: The Determination Of Potential Aggregation Values In An Ecotourism Landscapementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It highlights the importance of human society and its interaction with biophysical factors [3,4], which therefore reflects comprehensive landscape value assessments for efficient decision making [5]. Through harmonizing opinions from the perspective of stakeholders, landscape value assessment contributes to the process of territory planning and development [4,6,7], natural resources management [8,9], natural risk management [7], and assessments of socio-economic development [10][11][12]. This is a multi-dimensional approach for considering several aspects of landscape value, covering both the human and nature landscape [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, London has a disadvantage of riverside linear GOS. This type of GOS owns positive landscape values and can provide cultural services (Garcia et al, 2017;Vollmer et al, 2015). Thirdly, Shanghai and New York have more roadside linear open space than Tokyo and London.…”
Section: Assessing the Impacts Of Spatial Pattern Of Gosmentioning
confidence: 99%