Public perceptions on the application of artificial intelligence in healthcare: a qualitative meta-synthesis

Abstract

ObjectivesMedical artificial intelligence (AI) has been used widely applied in clinical field due to its convenience and innovation. However, several policy and regulatory issues such as credibility, sharing of responsibility and ethics have raised concerns in the use of AI. It is therefore necessary to understand the general public’s views on medical AI. Here, a meta-synthesis was conducted to analyse and summarise the public’s understanding of the application of AI in the healthcare field, to provide recommendations for future use and management of AI in medical practice.DesignThis was a meta-synthesis of qualitative studies.MethodA search was performed on the following databases to identify studies published in English and Chinese: MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of science, Cochrane library, Embase, PsycINFO, CNKI, Wanfang and VIP. The search was conducted from database inception to 25 December 2021. The meta-aggregation approach of JBI was used to summarise findings from qualitative studies, focusing on the public’s perception of the application of AI in healthcare.ResultsOf the 5128 studies screened, 12 met the inclusion criteria, hence were incorporated into analysis. Three synthesised findings were used as the basis of our conclusions, including advantages of medical AI from the public’s perspective, ethical and legal concerns about medical AI from the public’s perspective, and public suggestions on the application of AI in medical field.ConclusionResults showed that the public acknowledges the unique advantages and convenience of medical AI. Meanwhile, several concerns about the application of medical AI were observed, most of which involve ethical and legal issues. The standard application and reasonable supervision of medical AI is key to ensuring its effective utilisation. Based on the public’s perspective, this analysis provides insights and suggestions for health managers on how to implement and apply medical AI smoothly, while ensuring safety in healthcare practice.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42022315033.

Exploring the matrix: knowledge, perceptions and prospects of artificial intelligence and machine learning in Nigerian healthcare

“…Despite agreeing that artificial intelligence would play an integral role in future healthcare, two-thirds of the respondents were of the view that the adoption of artificial intelligence can raise new ethical challenges. This is similar to the report from a study in China (Wu et al, 2023). Patients' confidentiality is essential for high-quality healthcare delivery.…”

Patient Perspectives on AI for Mental Health Care: Cross-Sectional Survey Study (Preprint)

“…Participants in our study cited concerns consistent with previous work related to AI accuracy, risk of harm (e.g., wrong diagnosis, inappropriate treatment), 42,51,52 decreased human communication/connection, 34,42,46,51 and issues pertaining to confidentiality. 34,42,46,[52][53][54][55] Issues related to privacy were also the most commonly mentioned concern in the qualitative feedback.…”

Unpacking public resistance to health Chatbots: a parallel mediation analysis

“…In line with the prototype perception literature ( Gibbons and Gerrard, 1995 ; Lazuras et al, 2019 ) and existing public perception research on medical AI ( Esmaeilzadeh, 2020 ; Wu et al, 2023 ), the participants were asked to self-report their perceptions of the typical risk characteristics of health chatbots. An item example is as follows: “Health chatbots are dangerous” (Cronbach’s α = 0.841).…”