2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2017.04.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Public preferences for alternative electricity mixes in post-Fukushima Japan

Abstract: Using representative household survey data from Japan after the Fukushima accident, we estimate peoples' willingness-to-pay (WTP) for renewable, nuclear, and fossil fuels in electricity generation. We rely on random parameter econometric techniques to capture various degrees of heterogeneity between the respondents, and use detailed regional information to assess how WTP varies with the distance to both the nearest nuclear power plant and to Fukushima. Compared to fossil fuels, we find a positive WTP for renew… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the magnitude of this group remains somewhat unclear, we believe that the preference for new nuclear power plants will not be widespread. Furthermore, the acceptance levels for nuclear power were found to be either lower (Rehdanz et al, 2017;Woo et al, 2017) or relatively stable (Siegrist and Visschers, 2013) in the post-Fukushima area after 2011. Our findings show the majority of respondents to favour renewable energy sources in their portfolios, which is in in accordance with the acceptance levels associated with renewables (Bronfman et al, 2012;Ertör-Akyazı et al, 2012;Greenberg and Truelove, 2011;Tampakis et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussion and Policy Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Although the magnitude of this group remains somewhat unclear, we believe that the preference for new nuclear power plants will not be widespread. Furthermore, the acceptance levels for nuclear power were found to be either lower (Rehdanz et al, 2017;Woo et al, 2017) or relatively stable (Siegrist and Visschers, 2013) in the post-Fukushima area after 2011. Our findings show the majority of respondents to favour renewable energy sources in their portfolios, which is in in accordance with the acceptance levels associated with renewables (Bronfman et al, 2012;Ertör-Akyazı et al, 2012;Greenberg and Truelove, 2011;Tampakis et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussion and Policy Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In Japan, public support for and trust in nuclear power have visibly collapsed after the Fukushima accident [28,29]. Thus, renewable energy is considered the most favorable while nuclear energy is the least in Japan [30][31][32][33]. These previous studies mainly focus on the public's overall energy preferences, and some of them conducted cross-country comparisons.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most importantly for our purposes, the KHPS 2014 encompasses a module of energy-related questions (see [33] for more details). In particular, this module posed the following question to each household in terms of methods of electricity generation:…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These changes in the energy mix for electricity generation after the Fukushima disaster likely have disturbed the linkages among the costs of electricity from various fuel sources. Many studies have investigated how the Japanese energy mix should change [4][5][6] or have analyzed Japanese people's preferences regarding energy mixes after the disaster [7,8]. However, until now, few studies have used quantitative methods to analyze how electricity prices or costs of electricity generation from various fuel sources have changed since the Fukushima disaster.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%