Public preferences for primary care provision in Germany – a discrete choice experiment

Abstract

Background Primary care is a central element of healthcare and addresses the main health problems of the population. While primary care gains in importance due to an aging population, there is an ongoing debate on physician shortages in German rural regions. The study aims on analyzing the population’s preferences on primary healthcare and, therefore, on helping policy makers to make care delivery more responsive to patients’ needs when planning political reforms of primary care. Methods A paper-based discrete choice experiment (DCE) was used to assess preferences of the population of eight rural regions in Germany. Based on literature search and qualitative research, six attributes were selected and included in the choice experiment. The survey presented participants with eight choice sets in which they had to choose between two possible scenarios of care. A conditional logistic regression as well as a latent class model (LCM) were used to analyze preferences for primary healthcare. Results Nine hundred four participants completed the survey (response rate 46.1%). The conditional logistic regression showed significant impact of the attributes “home visits”, “distance to practice”, “number of healthcare providers”, “opening hours of the practice”, and “diagnostic facilities” on the respondents’ choices of primary healthcare alternatives. Moreover, the LCM identified four classes that can be characterized by preference homogeneity within and heterogeneity between the classes. Conclusion Although the study revealed heterogeneous preferences among the latent classes, several similarities in preferences for primary care could be detected. The knowledge on these public preferences may help policy makers when implementing new models of primary care and, thus, raise the populations’ acceptance of future primary care provision and innovative care models. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12875-019-0967-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Do Residents and Healthcare Providers Differ in Preference for Family Doctor Contract Service? Evidence From a Discrete Choice Experiment

“…Further, we also found different preferences in the way of service delivery between residents and healthcare providers. Similar to results from previous studies (16), our findings revealed that home visits significantly influenced the residents' preference for FDCS. The residents included in our study were key population, such as the elderly people, who generally have high healthcare needs and desire more home visit service.…”

“…Only one study to data measured the supply preferences from the perspective of healthcare providers (15). Meanwhile, similar studies have been conducted in other countries (16)(17)(18)(19)(20); nevertheless, considering that patients and healthcare providers references may be subjected to cultural and policy differences, the applicability of research from overseas to China mainland may be limited. More importantly, given the asymmetry of information between consumer and provider, it is not always clear that observed healthcare consumption is based on consumers' preferences and choice alone (21).…”

Current status of prevention and treatment of respiratory diseases in primary care in China: a cross-sectional study

“…Moreover, PHC institutions should set up chronic disease clinics for asthma and COPD, provide family practice contract service and carry out screening for chronic diseases, as well as health education in the community. Last, a discrete choice experiment revealed that preferences for primary care were significantly influenced by the provision of home visits, the distance to clinics, the clinics’ opening hours, and the diagnostic facilities in clinics [ 25 ]. As a consequence, PHC doctors could take the initiative to provide home visits, especially for the vulnerable group of older, multimorbid and immobile persons who have specific needs concerning care provision, or PHC doctors could conduct telephone interviews to facilitate monitoring of patients’ medication and symptoms.…”

How do nurses support chronically ill clients’ participation and self-management in primary care? A cross-country qualitative study

“…They also allow for closer cooperation with non-medical primary health care providers, including home care nursing services or pharmacies [ 35 , 36 ]. Multi-professional primary health care teams involving nurses are only rarely established in standard care but are being tested increasingly (partially as pilot projects) in some regions [ 3 , 37 ]. There are projects, too, in which different health professions cooperate to provide primary care while practicing in institutionally distinct facilities (such as family doctor practices and home care services).…”