Assessing determinants of PPP project performance: Applying AHP to urban drinking water sector in India http://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/8187/ Article LJMU has developed LJMU Research Online for users to access the research output of the University more effectively. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LJMU Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain.The version presented here may differ from the published version or from the version of the record. Please see the repository URL above for details on accessing the published version and note that access may require a subscription. Purpose -The purpose of this paper is to understand factors that affect the performance of projects being implemented on public-private partnership frameworks, with specific reference to urban drinking water sector in India.Design/methodology/approach -A listing of factors that have a bearing on project performance have been developed based on a review of the literature. Through a survey, seven factors that are relevant to the Indian context are determined. Interviews were then conducted across a cross section of government agencies, financial institutions/ development agencies, private sector operators and consultants to understand the relative importance of these attributes. A multi-criteria decision making Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) tool has been used to develop relative weights of these parameters.Findings -Ranking and relative weights of the factors in descending order are stakeholder consent and support for water PPP projects (22.1%), appropriate project structure (17.4%), availability of realistic baseline information (16.2%), reasonable water tariffs (13.9%), public sector capacity (13.0%), well developed market (9.5%) and water sector regulator (7.9%). There are differences amongst perception of various stakeholder groups.Research limitation/ implications -Water sector has not matured, and with the advent of newer formats, there could be significant changes in the sector. A number of projects available for study are limited. This exercise could be undertaken periodically and updated in relation to experiences in other infrastructure sectors.Practical implication -This analysis provides inputs to policy makers and project proponents for structuring more sustainable urban drinking water PPP projects, and have relevance to a wider group of stakeholders.Originality/value -Indian infrastructure PPP market is attracting increased attention from researchers, though not much in urban drinking water sector. This paper aims to contribute towards that research.