2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8543.2009.00773.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Public-Private Sector Wage Gap in Australia: Variation along the Distribution

Abstract: Previous research on public-private wage differentials in Australia has focused on the mean of the conditional wage distribution. Using six waves of the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia survey, this study employs quantile regressions to examine whether the sectoral wage effect varies along the wage distribution. For females, public sector wage premiums are relatively stable for almost the entire distribution. For males, they decrease monotonically and are negative for the top half of the dist… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

7
51
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
7
51
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Using data from the 14 waves (2001–2014) of HILDA, this paper investigates empirically the wage differentials between the public sector and the private sector in Australia. This paper is similar to Birch () and Cai and Liu () in the sense that we all focus on the sectoral wage effects over the full wage distribution. However, unlike Birch () and Cai and Liu (), we utilise the panel aspects of the HILDA data, which allows us to deal with the correlation between sector choice and unobserved heterogeneity by controlling for individual fixed effects (FE).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Using data from the 14 waves (2001–2014) of HILDA, this paper investigates empirically the wage differentials between the public sector and the private sector in Australia. This paper is similar to Birch () and Cai and Liu () in the sense that we all focus on the sectoral wage effects over the full wage distribution. However, unlike Birch () and Cai and Liu (), we utilise the panel aspects of the HILDA data, which allows us to deal with the correlation between sector choice and unobserved heterogeneity by controlling for individual fixed effects (FE).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…() conclude that the mean public–private earnings differentials can be fully explained by differences in individual characteristics and job characteristics between the two sectors, indicating that there is no public sector earnings premium in Australia. In contrast, Vella () and Cai and Liu () find that a significant wage premium remains for women, but men have no (Vella, ) or a negative (Cai & Liu, ) public sector premium once observable productivity characteristics are taken into account.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To increase the sample size and thus the accuracy of the estimated distribution, we followed others' footstep to pool six waves of the HILDA survey available at the time of writing this paper (e.g. Forbes et al, 2010;Cai and Liu, 2011). Another reason for pooling the data is that sufficiently large sample sizes are important in bootstrapping the standard errors of the decomposition results [7].…”
Section: Data Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We included the union variable in the analysis not for capturing the effects of the entire workplace relations; rather, it is because unions have been found in numerous studies to have an impact on wages even after controlling for other variables (e.g. Cai and Liu, 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%