2014
DOI: 10.1080/17549175.2014.891151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Public/private urban interfaces: type, adaptation, assemblage

Abstract: The urban interface between private and public space, the ways in which private plots plug into public networks, has long been recognized as a key issue in urban design theory. This paper presents a typology for the mapping and analysis of public/private interfaces. Drawing on mappings of the mixed morphology of the Australian inner-city, we develop a simple typology of five primary interface types classified according to access, setback, transparency and mode of access. From a theoretical framework of assembl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
82
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
82
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Street edges are frequently considered the most experientially important component of urban streets (Bobic 2004;Glaser et al 2012;Thwaites, Simkins, and Mathers 2013;Heffernan, Heffernan, and Pan 2014;Kickert 2016). They span the indoor-outdoor interface of streets and provide a built frontage, or façade, which significantly affects peoples' behavior on the street (Gehl, Kaefer, and Reigstad 2006;Mehta 2008;Gehl 2010;van Langelaar & van der Spek, 2012;Dovey and Wood 2015). Their influence on peoples' perception of the wider street is also considerable, impacting how enjoyable and experientially stimulating streets are (Lynch and Rivkin 1990;Mehta2008;Montgomery 2013;Heffernan, Heffernan, and Pan 2014;Ellard 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Street edges are frequently considered the most experientially important component of urban streets (Bobic 2004;Glaser et al 2012;Thwaites, Simkins, and Mathers 2013;Heffernan, Heffernan, and Pan 2014;Kickert 2016). They span the indoor-outdoor interface of streets and provide a built frontage, or façade, which significantly affects peoples' behavior on the street (Gehl, Kaefer, and Reigstad 2006;Mehta 2008;Gehl 2010;van Langelaar & van der Spek, 2012;Dovey and Wood 2015). Their influence on peoples' perception of the wider street is also considerable, impacting how enjoyable and experientially stimulating streets are (Lynch and Rivkin 1990;Mehta2008;Montgomery 2013;Heffernan, Heffernan, and Pan 2014;Ellard 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I define them based on a morphological typology: here, a 'type' does not refer to an 'archetype' that can be replicated in different contexts. Rather, it is shown by a diagram depicting something that works in general while still being geared toward the particularity of each instance [43][44][45]; in such a diagram, the spatial arrangement of shops is able to imply the ways in which a shopping center 1) operates economically and 2) influences the production of urban public life [44]. The 'main street' is largely derived from the 'pedestrian street', where a pedestrian flow is lined by various shops and is centered on a street intersection.…”
Section: Retail Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter is important with respect to the quality of public spaces and to an active street life, referring back to Jacobs (1961) 'eyes on the street' concept. Here, the length of the plot frontage is found critical for establishing this relation (Alonso de Andrade et al, 2018;Dovey et al, 2017;Dovey and Wood, 2015). Plot frontage length is frequently measured as frontage-to-depth ratio (Dovey et al, 2017;Sevstuk et al, 2016); this is relevant for rectangular plots but cannot capture the same relation for irregularly shaped plots.…”
Section: Starting Points For Classification: Geometric and Configuratmentioning
confidence: 99%