1992
DOI: 10.1016/0363-8111(92)90008-m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Public relations and mass communication in Eastern Europe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The theoretical aspects were seen more positively, but the practical result was negatively viewed. A result of this trend is found in the observation by Hiebert (1992), concerning Central and Eastern Europe, that Russia has become part of the global PR picture as a result of the apparent ascendency of PR over journalism (Macnamara, 2014; Salter, 2005; Shin and Cameron, 2005). In reply to the final question on the prediction of future trends, the respondents foresee no change in the continued interaction between journalists and PR practitioners.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The theoretical aspects were seen more positively, but the practical result was negatively viewed. A result of this trend is found in the observation by Hiebert (1992), concerning Central and Eastern Europe, that Russia has become part of the global PR picture as a result of the apparent ascendency of PR over journalism (Macnamara, 2014; Salter, 2005; Shin and Cameron, 2005). In reply to the final question on the prediction of future trends, the respondents foresee no change in the continued interaction between journalists and PR practitioners.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Observers witnessed a rapidly changing information environment. Hiebert (1992) concluded that ‘all of the above indicates that Eastern and Central Europe are now rapidly becoming a part of the global public relations picture’ (p. 186). There were key people in PR from abroad travelling to the Soviet Union, who sowed the foundations of PR there.…”
Section: The Situation In Russia: Pr’s Undermining Of Journalism?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous researchers have illustrated how countries throughout the world show cultural differences in public relations activities, for example, in Korea (Shin and Cameron, 2001), Japan , China (Zetlin, 1995), India (Singh, 2000), the Philippines (Panol, 2000), Malaysia (Kaur, 1997), Singapore (Beng, 1994;Wee et al, 1996) and Taiwan (Huang, 2000). Similarly, recent studies have focused on varying public relations practices in such European nations as Austria and Norway (Haug and Koppang, 1997;Taylor, 2000), the UK (Davis, 2000), Germany (Ferguson, 1998), Greece (Lyra, 1991), Hungary (Hiebert, 1994), Bulgaria (Dimitrova, 1998), Slovenia (Vercic et al, 1996) and the post-Communist world (Hiebert, 1992;1994). Even studies about public relations in Australia (Singh and Smyth, 2000), the Middle East (Zaharna, 1995) and Africa (VanLeuven and Pratt, 1996) have shown that there are many challenges and opportunities arising from cultural variance in public relations.…”
Section: Cultural Variance In the Source-reporter Relationshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirical evidence is available regarding the nature of public relations activities in different cultures (Beng, 1994;Haug and 254 JAE-HWA SHIN and GLEN T. CAMERON Koppang, 1997;Hiebert, 1992;Huang, 2000;Kaur, 1997;Lyra, 1991;Singh, 2000;Singh and Smyth, 2000;Taylor, 2000;VanLeuven and Pratt, 1996;Wee et al, 1996). The evidence is particularly strong in scholarship on media relations practice, which has long recognized that facets and characteristics of the relationship between public relations practitioners and journalists reflect the cultural variance among countries (Shin and Cameron, 2001;.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the common perception of public relations as suspicious propaganda; this view stems from the historic role that censorship used to play in the mass media, the subjugation of all such media to a single doctrine (Hiebert 1992b), and the resulting stereotypical conviction that "the press lies"; 2. the failure to understand the point of marketing and promoting products and businesses and building the images of companies and their executives; this problem originates from the fact that, at a time of severe shortages, all goods manufactured in the socialist economy were readily sold; 3. the belief that companies, their owners and/or their successes are better left unpromoted as high profiles may bring on additional tax sanctions; this view stems from the fact that, for ideological reasons, all privately owned operations were considered suspicious and subject to ad hoc taxation. (aawniczak 2003); 4. the fears for the "negative externalities" (Grunig and Grunig 2005) of the privatization process and resistance to it.…”
Section: Special Characteristics Of Public Relations In the Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%