2017
DOI: 10.1111/risa.12920
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Public Response to a Near‐Miss Nuclear Accident Scenario Varying in Causal Attributions and Outcome Uncertainty

Abstract: Many studies have investigated public reactions to nuclear accidents. However, few studies focused on more common events when a serious accident could have happened but did not. This study evaluated public response (emotional, cognitive, and behavioral) over three phases of a near-miss nuclear accident. Simulating a loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA) scenario, we manipulated (1) attribution for the initial cause of the incident (software failure vs. cyber terrorist attack vs. earthquake), (2) attribution for halt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The definition of near-miss in Section 3.1 shows that the causation factors of near-misses are similar to the ones of accidents. It is also verified in other studies [64][65][66][67]. The opportunity factor is the only difference between near-misses and accidents.…”
Section: Near-miss Causation Modelsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The definition of near-miss in Section 3.1 shows that the causation factors of near-misses are similar to the ones of accidents. It is also verified in other studies [64][65][66][67]. The opportunity factor is the only difference between near-misses and accidents.…”
Section: Near-miss Causation Modelsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Cambraia et al [18] defined a near-miss as an unanticipated event that requires a rapid burst of energy and may end in an accident. Williamsen [40] stated that near-misses occur when there are no injuries, property damage, or other proof that they had taken place.…”
Section: Near-miss Incidents In the Construction Sectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of a near-miss in risk perception has been used to explain how people respond to events that could have happened, but by chance did not. This framework has been used in risk perception research addressing avoidance and mitigation responses in disaster management (Cui, Rosoff, & John, 2018;Dillon & Tinsley, 2008;Dillon, Tinsley, & Burns, 2014;Dillon, Tinsley, & Cronin, 2011;Dupey & Smith, 2019;Madsen, Dillon, & Tinsley, 2016;Phimister, Oktem, Kleindorfer, & Kunreuther, 2003;Tiller & Bliss, 2017).…”
Section: Near-miss Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%