2020
DOI: 10.1108/ijpsm-05-2019-0120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Public servants coping with competing demands on their agency in client relationships

Abstract: PurposeThis paper analyzes how public servants who work with young people discursively cope with competing demands on their agency, defined as their orientation toward and capabilities to influence their clients. Previous studies revealed how public servants treat their clients when facing competing demands but paid less attention to how public servants define their agency.Design/methodology/approachMicro-level discourse analysis is applied to analyze how public servants represent their agency in client relati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies on street-level bureaucrats state that these professionals face conflicts and contradictory demands from policy requirements, clients' needs, professional codes, stakeholders' interests and established institutional practices (Lipsky, 2010; Tummers et al. , 2015; Tuominen and Hasu, 2020). The adoption of an organizational idea, such as co-production, can add yet another demand to their already complex and ambiguous work (Mik-Meyer and Villadsen, 2013; Taylor and Kelly, 2006).…”
Section: Theoretical Framework: Scandinavian Institutionalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies on street-level bureaucrats state that these professionals face conflicts and contradictory demands from policy requirements, clients' needs, professional codes, stakeholders' interests and established institutional practices (Lipsky, 2010; Tummers et al. , 2015; Tuominen and Hasu, 2020). The adoption of an organizational idea, such as co-production, can add yet another demand to their already complex and ambiguous work (Mik-Meyer and Villadsen, 2013; Taylor and Kelly, 2006).…”
Section: Theoretical Framework: Scandinavian Institutionalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frontline workers, faced with work pressures and a substantial degree of autonomy and influence, develop operating procedures to make their day-to-day work manageable and enable them to meet their goals (Lipsky, 1980(Lipsky, , 2010Tummers et al, 2015;Tuominen & Hasu, 2020;Zacka, 2017). How frontline workers make sense of interactions with so-called 'service users' has been studied most readily in terms of coping strategies in public administration.…”
Section: Conceptual Framework: Frontline Workers and Community Intera...mentioning
confidence: 99%