2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.01.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Public Speaking Anxiety Scale: Preliminary psychometric data and scale validation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
46
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
46
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Exclusion criteria included having a deficit in stereoscopic vision or problematic balance impacting the experience of VR, a severe psychiatric disorder that requires dedicated care (including severe major depression, alcohol or drug abuse, bipolarity, and psychosis), active psychoactive medication (unless stable for the last 3 months), or an ongoing or planned psychological treatment during the study duration. To be included, participants also had to score ≥60 on the Public Speaking Anxiety Scale (PSAS) (Bartholomay & Houlihan, 2016) serving as a primary outcome, corresponding to the 70th population percentile. Meeting criteria for social anxiety disorder was not an inclusion criterion, but all included participants did meet criteria, most of whom with the performance-only specifier.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exclusion criteria included having a deficit in stereoscopic vision or problematic balance impacting the experience of VR, a severe psychiatric disorder that requires dedicated care (including severe major depression, alcohol or drug abuse, bipolarity, and psychosis), active psychoactive medication (unless stable for the last 3 months), or an ongoing or planned psychological treatment during the study duration. To be included, participants also had to score ≥60 on the Public Speaking Anxiety Scale (PSAS) (Bartholomay & Houlihan, 2016) serving as a primary outcome, corresponding to the 70th population percentile. Meeting criteria for social anxiety disorder was not an inclusion criterion, but all included participants did meet criteria, most of whom with the performance-only specifier.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding divergent validity, the guidelines used in this article and others were correlations of 0.01-0.20 (e.g., Bartholomay & Houlihan, 2016;Levinson & Rodebaugh, 2011). All three subscales and the total score of the FAPIS were not significantly related to the Anxiety and Stress subscale on the DASS.…”
Section: Divergent Validitymentioning
confidence: 60%
“…The inclusion criteria were age between 21 and 35 years, literacy in English and computer skills, absence of current or previous history of neuropsychiatric disorders, and willingness to be video recorded. Eligible participants had scores of ≥31 on the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS) [32-33], ≥60 on the Public Speaking Anxiety Scale (PSAS) [34], and ≤8 on the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test [35]. Those who had suicidal ideation (indicated by item 9 of the Beck Depression Inventory - 2nd edition) [36], irregular heart rhythm, gross visual or hearing impairments, psychoactive medication, or concurrent psychotherapy were excluded from the study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%