Critical Theory and Authoritarian Populism 2018
DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv9hvtcf.11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Public Sphere and World-System:

Abstract: The rise of populism and its authoritarian variations over the last decade has not been confined to the West. Recent academic literature/debate on populism 1 points out that the global populist surge constitutes a diffuse set of political and economic categories (rhetoric, style, identity, etc.) that can also be perceived at the margins of the West in countries like Hungary, South Korea,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, this article proposes the following. First, authoritarian populism is likely to advance in democratic countries when (populist) political elites adopt the ideational elements of populism (Mudde 2004; Mudde and Rovira Kaltwasser 2012, 2013, 2017) and authoritarianism (Morelock and Narita 2018: 139), undercutting liberal democratic values, principles, and norms (Adam 2018:1; Bugaric 2019: 391). Such authoritarian populism is compatible with any ideology on the political spectrum and within diverse social bases and political regimes (Mudde and Rovira Kaltwasser 2012, 2013, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, this article proposes the following. First, authoritarian populism is likely to advance in democratic countries when (populist) political elites adopt the ideational elements of populism (Mudde 2004; Mudde and Rovira Kaltwasser 2012, 2013, 2017) and authoritarianism (Morelock and Narita 2018: 139), undercutting liberal democratic values, principles, and norms (Adam 2018:1; Bugaric 2019: 391). Such authoritarian populism is compatible with any ideology on the political spectrum and within diverse social bases and political regimes (Mudde and Rovira Kaltwasser 2012, 2013, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This article defines authoritarian populism as populism that political actors and elites develop based on ideational elements that constitute populism (Mudde 2004; Mudde and Rovira Kaltwasser 2012, 2013, 2017) and authoritarianism (Morelock and Narita 2018: 139). These actors and elites are committed to performing authoritarian tendencies (Chacko 2020: 206; Hewison 2017: 437), seeking “social homogeneity through coercion” (Morelock 2018: xiv), and establishing coercive media management strategy (Waisbord 2012; Zweg 2018) to undermine democratic values, norm and principles (Mietzner 2020: 1022; Power 2018: 335).…”
Section: Authoritarian Populism and Journalistic Freedommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…of ideas that can be either strategically employed or stem from genuine conviction (Applebaum, 2020;Morelock & Narita, 2018;Jansen, 2011). This perspective allows us to delve into the core ideas and principles that underpin populist movements, enabling a more profound understanding of their dynamics.…”
Section: Existing Approaches To the Problem Of Social And Political P...mentioning
confidence: 99%