2001
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-842x.2001.tb00577.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Public support for smoking bans in bars and gaming venues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Section 10 deals with the duty to prevent the spread of smoke from areas such as bars into smoke-free areas. Some other Australian studies 36,37 have used a forced-choice approach, that is, subjects have only been asked if they support a total ban on licensed premises. These data also demonstrate increasing support for such bans.…”
Section: Licensed Premises Smoking Restrictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Section 10 deals with the duty to prevent the spread of smoke from areas such as bars into smoke-free areas. Some other Australian studies 36,37 have used a forced-choice approach, that is, subjects have only been asked if they support a total ban on licensed premises. These data also demonstrate increasing support for such bans.…”
Section: Licensed Premises Smoking Restrictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In that study, equal proportions of re gular patrons said their patronage would increase as said it would decrease. 37 Regular patrons were def ined as those attending the relevant venue at least once per week. The analysis reported here used one visit in the past month to subdivide respondents.…”
Section: Licensed Premises Smoking Restrictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] However, survey research cannot illuminate how laypeople talk, positively or negatively, about different regulatory options. This paper presents a detailed analysis of conversations between groups of smokers and groups of nonsmokers to address this gap, examining the ways in which different regulatory options were discussed as acceptable or unacceptable.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Increasing community access to smoke-free environments through the introduction of such bans enjoys strong community support from both smokers and nonsmokers. [4][5][6][7][8] Despite this, in some public places, such as the hospitality industry and in particular licensed premises, the introduction of smoking bans either by self regulation or legislation has been limited and subject to successful industry lobbying for exemptions. [9][10][11][12][13] Identified barriers to adoption of bans include the perception that bans will be unpopular, that they will be hard to implement and result in loss of business.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%