Public Transit Equity Analysis at Metropolitan and Local Scales: A Focus on Nine Large Cities in the US

Abstract

Recent studies on transit service through an equity lens have captured broad trends from the literature and national-level data or analyzed disaggregate data at the local level. This study integrates these methods by employing a geostatistical analysis of new transit access and income data compilations from the Environmental Protection Agency. By using a national data set, this study demonstrates a method for income-based transit equity analysis and provides results spanning nine large auto-oriented cities in the US. Results demonstrate variability among cities’ transit services to low-income populations, with differing results when viewed at the regional and local levels. Regional-level analysis of transit service hides significant variation through spatial averaging, whereas the new data employed in this study demonstrates a block-group scale equity analysis that can be used on a national-scale data set. The methods used can be adapted for evaluation of transit and other modes’ transportation service in areas to evaluate equity at the regional level and at the neighborhood scale while controlling for spatial autocorrelation. Transit service equity planning can be enhanced by employing local Moran’s I to improve local analysis.

Bike share responses to COVID-19

“…Rapid responses to the pandemic have in some ways shortchanged the planning process, leading to challenges from equity standpoints. Low-income communities suffer disproportionately from reduced access to basic needs following transit changes ( Al Mamun and Lownes, 2011 , Griffin and Sener, 2016 , Karner and Golub, 2015 , NAACP, 2020 , Reddy et al, 2010 ). Inequitable access to bike sharing may be mitigated by supporting annual bike share memberships ( Qian and Jaller, 2020 ) and incorporating dockless services ( Qian et al, 2020 ).…”

Improving Public Transportation Safety in COVID-19 Era Through Crowdsourcing Technique

“…Many urban residents in central city take public transit routinely for daily activities while many suburban commuters ride buses or trains to workplace in urban core through transit centers or park-and-ride facilities. Access to public transit services provides affordable mobility across all social classes, especially to the residents in large metropolitan areas (Griffin and Sener 2016). There are over 30 million daily trips made by public transit in the US, and the trips within the nation's top one hundred largest metropolitan areas account for about 95% of all transit passenger miles traveled (Tomer et al 2011).…”

THRESHOLDS in ACCESSIBILITY: IZMIR CENTRAL CITY CASE

“…gelecekteki toplu taşıma hizmetlerinin değerlendirilmesine yardımcı olacağını belirtmişlerdir (Griffin ve Şener;2016). Medellin (2007) çalışmalarında; yaptıkları analizlerin yolcuların otobüs hizmetini kullandıkları sırada karşılaştıkları maliyetleri ve farklı sosyoekonomik yapıya sahip kullanıcılar arasındaki eşitliği incelemeye yönelik olduğunu belirtmişlerdir.…”