2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-4565.2005.00020.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Public Understanding of Food Risk Issues and Food Risk Messages on the Island of Ireland: The Views of Food Safety Experts

Abstract: Food safety experts have a key role in constructing food risk messages and thus their perceptions will influence how food risk issues are communicated to the public. This research examined the perceptions of food safety experts regarding public understanding of food risk issues and food risk messages on the island of Ireland. It also looked into expert views of the barriers to effective food risk communication and how to improve food risk messages. One hundred and forty‐three experts, working in areas related … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

2
51
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
51
4
Order By: Relevance
“…There is limited research about how food regulators perceive consumers to understand food regulation with existing literature suggesting the food regulators believe that consumers overestimate the risk of new technologies such as genetically modified food and underestimate microbial risks (De Boer et al 2005). It is this gap that forms the basis of this paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is limited research about how food regulators perceive consumers to understand food regulation with existing literature suggesting the food regulators believe that consumers overestimate the risk of new technologies such as genetically modified food and underestimate microbial risks (De Boer et al 2005). It is this gap that forms the basis of this paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research suggests that food regulators view the public as underestimating the risks associated with food and as having limited understanding of scientific information about food safety (De Boer et al 2005). This paper presents strategies used by food regulators to improve communication of food risks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies argued that the public tends to 'misjudge' the relative food risks at least when compared with the expert opinions (Lazo et al 2000;hansen et al 2003). These studies reported that the experts tend to believe in the rationality of arguments, facts, and science, arguing that science in itself provides an adequate strategy to control risks, while the consumers tend to use factors such as the distrust in social actors, the credibility of risk regulators and the perceived controllability of risks in assessing risks (Figure 1) (De Boer et al 2005;Van Kleef et al 2007). Understanding potential differences in perceptions of the effective FrM between consumers and experts is important for designing the appropriate FrM strategies, as a failure to integrate societal concerns and values into the risk analysis procedures is one of the factors associated with the decline in the public confidence in the risk assessment and risk management (renn and rohrmann 2000; Frewer et al 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knowledge has been shown to play a role in the formation of perceptions and beliefs and therefore, has an impact on current food safety practices and willingness to change current practices to bring them in line with 'best practice' guidelines (27). Associations between the socio-demographic characteristics of the individual (including age, gender, level of education, living environment, social class and participation in home economics training), risk awareness, food safety knowledge and behavior have also been observed (9,33,36,42).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%