2017
DOI: 10.1089/hs.2016.0074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Public Understanding of Medical Countermeasures

Abstract: Medical countermeasures, including new drugs and vaccines, are necessary to protect the public's health from novel diseases and terrorist threats. Experience with the 2001 anthrax attack and the 2009 H1N1 pandemic suggest that there is limited willingness to accept such drugs and that minority groups may respond differently from others. We conducted 148 intercept interviews in the metropolitan Washington, DC, area, examining 2 hypothetical scenarios: a new respiratory virus and public exposure to high levels o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…9,10 In a qualitative study on public un- sheets like "experimental," "accelerated approval," and "off-label" prompted respondents to have strong negative emotions. 11 The phrase "Emergency Use Authorization" triggered mixed responses, ranging from "important" and "helpful"…”
Section: Learning From Past Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…9,10 In a qualitative study on public un- sheets like "experimental," "accelerated approval," and "off-label" prompted respondents to have strong negative emotions. 11 The phrase "Emergency Use Authorization" triggered mixed responses, ranging from "important" and "helpful"…”
Section: Learning From Past Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…to "risky," "suspicious," "desperate," and "over-controlling." 11 FDA must confirm that they will release full data on adverse events and modify EUA approvals and fact sheets accordingly.…”
Section: Learning From Past Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When faced with a crisis situation, individuals seek information to bolster coping, reduce uncertainty, and determine personal relevance and risk (Austin et al, 2012;Liu et al, 2017). To validate this new information, individuals use a variety of sources and channels (Wray et al, 2008).…”
Section: Cognitive Copingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These preparations are not useful, however, if people are not willing to take or inadvertently misuse a recommended MCM, or if consequential disparities exist in the level at which people can access knowledge about the risks and benefits of MCMs during an emergency. 8 12 The technical novelty of certain MCMs, accelerated regulatory approval, or other unfamiliar and/or complex circumstances may heighten people’s perceived risk of MCMs, diminish public trust in MCM regulators or recommenders, or seed public aversion, all of which can jeopardize population health in an emergency. 13 16 An amplified sense of fear and vulnerability during a CBRN event may lead some people to overdose on a prescribed MCM, based on the incorrect assumption that a greater quantity of an MCM is more protective than a small quantity, or lead those not at risk to demand an MCM that is best reserved for others.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%