Public Understanding of Risks from Gene-Environment Interaction in Common Diseases: Implications for Public Communications

Abstract

Background/Aims: Public understanding of the relationship between health behaviors and genes is likely to affect the motivational impact of learning information about one’s own genes. Extant research has featured difficulty measuring public understandings of this relationship. This essay explores public understanding of the relationship between genes and behavior, especially with regard to the mathematical relationships to risk concept. It contributes a psychometrically valid scale for measuring beliefs about gene- behavior relationships. Methods: Three population representative surveys (n = 633, 658, 1,218) were conducted using the Knowledge Networks panel platform. Results: Interpretations of risk vary depending on whether genes and behavior are conceived of as health-damaging (loss frame) or health-protecting (gain frame). In the loss frame, the majority of the population adopts an additive model of the relationship with approximately one-third adopting an amplificative model. In the gain frame, beliefs are divided roughly equally among additive, amplificative and sub-additive models. Scores on the nonmathematically based scale indicate higher belief in the existence of interaction than scores on the more concrete question format. Conclusions: The existence of different interpretations of gene-behavior relationships based on gain/loss frame and abstract/concrete modes indicates the need to select frame and mode carefully in both teaching and research. Research is needed to identify optimal configurations for teaching and presenting this relatively complex material.

Perceptions of genetic research in three rural Appalachian Ohio communities

“…This was reinforced by the finding that most had never heard the term "epigenetics" and, when asked what topics of genetics they would be interested in learning about, many responded that they wanted to know "how environmental pollutants could affect their genes". Our findings echo a summary of a recent study by Condit et al (2011) that explored the public understanding of genes and the environment. Using surveys and mathematical relationships of risk, Condit concluded that the perception of how the environment affects genes and the nature of its additive process on health is not easily understood.…”

The Association of Beliefs About Heredity with Preventive and Interpersonal Behaviors in Communities Affected by Podoconiosis in Rural Ethiopia

“…6 However, many posit that realization of these benefits will be challenged by lay audience's beliefs about the role of genetics and the difficulties of conveying information about complex gene-by-environment influences on disease. 7 Adapting this information for global contexts characterized by low literacy and diverse cultural norms will also increase the challenge.…”

Health psychology and translational genomic research: Bringing innovation to cancer-related behavioral interventions.

“…Data from Condit (Condit, 2010;Condit & Shen, 2011) suggest that most individuals have separate mental tracks for considering how behavior affects health outcomes and for how genes affect health outcomes (such as cancer). Moreover, most are adept at switching from the genetic track to the behavior track.…”