Publication activity of chief and consultant general/visceral surgeons in German university hospitals—a ten-year analysis

Abstract

Purpose The publication activity of 38 German general/visceral surgery university departments, documented by first or last authorship from staff surgeons (chief and consultants), was evaluated. Methods The observation period extended from 2007 to 2017 and all PubMed-listed publications were considered. Impact factor (IF) was evaluated through the publishing journal’s 5-year IF in 2016, as was the IF for each individual publication. Ranking was expressed in quartiles. Results The staff surgeons of the 38 departments comprised 442 surgeons, of which only 351 (79.4%) were active as first or last authors. Four thousand six hundred and ninety-nine publications published in 702 journals were recorded. The four leading departments in publication number published as much as the last 20 departments (1330 vs. 1336 publications, respectively). The mean of the first (most active) department quartile was 19.6 publications, the second 15.4, the third 11.0, and the last quartile 7.6 per publishing surgeon. The total cumulative impact factor was 14,130. When examining the mean number of publications per publishing surgeons per the 10 year period, the mean of the first quartile was 57.9 cumulative IF, the second 45.0, the third 29.5, and the fourth quartile 17.1. With 352 (7.5%) publications, the most frequently used journal was Chirurg, followed by Langenbeck’s Archives of Surgery with 274 (5.8%) publications. Pancreas-related topics led in terms of publication number and IF generated per individual publication. Conclusion A significant difference in publication performance of individual departments was apparent that cannot be explained by staff number. This indicates that there are as yet unknown factors responsible for minor publication activity in many university departments.

Wissenschaftliche Aktivität in der deutschen Thoraxchirurgie gemessen an der Publikationsleistung

“…In diesem Zusammenhang wird für die Zertifizierung als Lungenkrebszentrum der DKG eine Studienquote von ≥ 5% bezogen auf die Anzahl Primärfälle neu diagnostizierter Lungenkrebspatienten als ein Zertifizierungskriterium gefordert [8]. Die vorliegende Analyse der wissenschaftlichen Aktivität in der deutschen Thoraxchirurgie konnte gemessen an der Publikationstätigkeit über einen Erhebungszeitraum von 10 Jahren erstmalig neben einer positiven Entwicklung in der Publikationshäufigkeit Die Bedeutung eigenständiger Organisationstrukturen für die Publikationsleistungen chirurgischer Fachgebiete wurde bereits für andere Disziplinen diskutiert [11,12,13,14,15,16]. Übereinstimmungen mit bibliometrischen Analysen im Bereich der universitären plastischen Chirurgie und auch Gefäßchirurgie sind sichtbar.…”