2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11019-017-9774-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Publication ethics: science versus commerce

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…He has also discussed the issue of publishers’ responsibility for such content and has concluded that if the fake news does not harm or defame identifiable individuals, the law is not breached (Mazur 1999 ). Part of the problem is also predatory journals, in which scientific standards are not met (ten Have and Gordijn 2017 ). Due to a lack of a high standard of review, they allow the publishing of articles that could be classified as medical fake news.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He has also discussed the issue of publishers’ responsibility for such content and has concluded that if the fake news does not harm or defame identifiable individuals, the law is not breached (Mazur 1999 ). Part of the problem is also predatory journals, in which scientific standards are not met (ten Have and Gordijn 2017 ). Due to a lack of a high standard of review, they allow the publishing of articles that could be classified as medical fake news.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%