2012
DOI: 10.3109/07380577.2011.629024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 287 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Make efforts to use and report effect sizes (eg, treatment effect such as Cohen's D, regression coefficient, odds ratio). The use of effect sizes are highly encouraged by both the American Psychological Association (APA) 31 and the American Educational Research Association (AERA) 32 because they provide scale-free measures of practical meaningfulness. 33,34 Effect size allows for comparisons across studies by reporting the strength of the treatment or intervention regardless of sample size.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Make efforts to use and report effect sizes (eg, treatment effect such as Cohen's D, regression coefficient, odds ratio). The use of effect sizes are highly encouraged by both the American Psychological Association (APA) 31 and the American Educational Research Association (AERA) 32 because they provide scale-free measures of practical meaningfulness. 33,34 Effect size allows for comparisons across studies by reporting the strength of the treatment or intervention regardless of sample size.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We chose to rely on estimation techniques with 95% confidence intervals and ratio analysis as recommended by the APA [20] and following recent precedents in the HCI community (a non-exhaustive list of CHI and VIS studies without p-values can be found in [66]). As discussed in [67], there is a push in the CHI community to shift focus towards effect sizes and away from p-values: effect sizes allow for a more nuanced analysis of results rather than a dichotomous inference based on p-values.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants received research credit in exchange for participation. This study was approved by a human subjects research committee and APA ethical guidelines were followed (APA, 2010). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%