2020
DOI: 10.1111/bjd.18952
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Publication of national dermatology guidelines as a Research Letter in the BJD : can less ever be enough?

Abstract: Linked Article: van Zuuren et al. Br J Dermatol 2020; 182:1504–1506.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6 Therefore, there is a need to collate CPGs in common dermatological diseases available internationally. 7 Firstly, this may help reduce research waste and identify high-quality CPGs and systematic reviews for future guideline development groups (GDGs) to reference from, avoiding duplication of work. Secondly, it will provide patients and clinicians with a summary of critically appraised dermatology CPGs, also highlighting areas for improvement in CPG reporting and development standards.…”
Section: What Does This Study Add?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6 Therefore, there is a need to collate CPGs in common dermatological diseases available internationally. 7 Firstly, this may help reduce research waste and identify high-quality CPGs and systematic reviews for future guideline development groups (GDGs) to reference from, avoiding duplication of work. Secondly, it will provide patients and clinicians with a summary of critically appraised dermatology CPGs, also highlighting areas for improvement in CPG reporting and development standards.…”
Section: What Does This Study Add?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, there is a need to collate CPGs in common dermatological diseases available internationally 7 . Firstly, this may help reduce research waste and identify high‐quality CPGs and systematic reviews for future guideline development groups (GDGs) to reference from, avoiding duplication of work.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the rapid increase in the number of CPGs, challenges remain. These include redundancy of different teams working on CPGs with similar findings, inconsistencies in methodology across different guidelines, and outdated guidelines 18 . Guidelines that do not utilize systematic methods such as detailed eligibility criteria and comprehensive search of databases can reduce the reliability of recommendations 19 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%